Originally posted by tangalog2200
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
WHO ??? came closest to beating FLOYD???
Collapse
-
Originally posted by larryxxx... View PostNot sure why posters keep saying that fight was a robbery...if you watch it and score it round by round, yes it was a close fight...but how can Robbery be used?
Comment
-
Originally posted by optkliluzn View PostI didn't think the fight was close the last time I scored it, robbery was right in my opinion. In Floyd's defense though to be honest (and I HATE Floyd) I do believe he was either mentally side tracked or just had his only off night, I have never seen him fight that bad for 12 rounds.
Who knows?
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View PostRath, why are you still doing this? I don't get it.
Anyway, I re-watched the Mayweather Castillo fight last night. Had it 114-112 for Floyd. Could have easily been 113-113, and of course some would see it in Castillo's favor.
The press row scores were on both sides as well. He definitely came close, but I don't think there was a case for robbery. Steve Kim had it 116-112 Castillo. Kevin Iole had it 115-113 Mayweather and Doug Fischer had it 115-114 Mayweather. I have no doubt that he came the closest to beating Mayweather.
One interesting thing I didn't notice before is that Floyd was actually asked about his shoulder after round 1.
they also were rubbing and massaging his shoulder between rounds.
Castillo put in his work, and I think Floyd started hating Larry Merchant that night.
Soon after he became money mayweather right?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Zaroku View PostRath, do you believe PAC did better than Castillo or Maidana?
just look at it this way, if castillo, oscar and pac fought that guy but not named floyd (if you know what i am getting at) they all won.
in fact final score card says pac won and that was a fact.
if we can not rely on the final score card then where?
i was wrong when i said that the man who manually wrote the final score made mistake 36 times and not once did he realized it, it was not 36 times but 72 times.
remember also that i challenged all boxing historian when i said that it never happened in the history of boxing where the there were a mistake on the final score card.
did someone prove me wrong?Last edited by Rath; 06-06-2016, 01:14 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rath View Posti don't think maidana beat floyd but all three beat floyd, castillo oscar and pac
just look at it this way, if castillo, oscar and pac fought that guy but not named floyd (if you know what i am getting at) they all won.
in fact final score card says pac won and that was a fact.
if we can not rely on the final score card then where?
i was wrong when i said that the man who manually wrote the final score made mistake 36 times and not once did he realized it, it was not 36 times but 72 times.
Has anyone??
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rath View Posti don't think maidana beat floyd but all three beat floyd, castillo oscar and pac
just look at it this way, if castillo, oscar and pac fought that guy but not named floyd (if you know what i am getting at) they all won.
in fact final score card says pac won and that was a fact.
if we can not rely on the final score card then where?
i was wrong when i said that the man who manually wrote the final score made mistake 36 times and not once did he realized it, it was not 36 times but 72 times.
remember also that i challenged all boxing historian when i said that it never happened in the history of boxing where the there were a mistake on the final score card.
did someone prove me wrong?
Nobody has challenged you on this point with any factual evidence.
Comment
Comment