Comments Thread For: Ingle Tabs Kell Brook as Being Better Than Naseem Hamed
But the speed with which Brook stopped his game, if outclassed, opponent was sure to raise questions about how the IBF managed to select Bizier as a mandatory challenger for the title. [Click Here To Read More]
Stop. Naseem Hamed is HOF material. Kell has had one fight and the rest have been cab drivers, milk men, and paper boys. He would easily get beat by Bradley, Khan, Garcia and Thurman.
Brook is not a better FIGHTER than Hamed. That's also fact.
No, they are not the same thing. Brook actually uses combos and has a concept of good defense, which Hamed sorely lacked. Hamed had KO power and blistering speed, which Brook can't come close to.
Ohh, better than Hamed? Really setting lofty goals huh. Well at least brook beat his first step up in class opponent when he defeated Porter while Hamed was outclassed when he finally fought a top fighter in their prime in Barrera.
Stop. Naseem Hamed is HOF material. Kell has had one fight and the rest have been cab drivers, milk men, and paper boys. He would easily get beat by Bradley, Khan, Garcia and Thurman.
Kel Brook doesn't need to be better than Naseem to handle the guys you named there. And handle them he would, unless he's slipped badly since he beat Porter.
Forget about GGG, those are the fights Brook should be chasing, starting with Garcia.
Stop. Naseem Hamed is HOF material. Kell has had one fight and the rest have been cab drivers, milk men, and paper boys. He would easily get beat by Bradley, Khan, Garcia and Thurman.
Ohh, better than Hamed? Really setting lofty goals huh. Well at least brook beat his first step up in class opponent when he defeated Porter while Hamed was outclassed when he finally fought a top fighter in their prime in Barrera.
I'll admit Hamed was awkward, but Marco Antonio was no ordinary fighter in his prime. Barrera is HOF material and Hamed was probably the win that gets him in. Carson Jones, on the other hand....
Comment