The IBF is going to kill a fighter soon with these mandatory fights

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cobra_
    GGG turn Cobra to rat
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2013
    • 1068
    • 29
    • 5
    • 12,224

    #1

    The IBF is going to kill a fighter soon with these mandatory fights

    That's how people get hurt by putting them in mismatches like this.
  • .!WAR MIKEY!.
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2015
    • 23780
    • 889
    • 769
    • 309,182

    #2
    **** it, you know the slogan.

    IF HE DIES, HE DIES.

    This is a bloody sport.

    Comment

    • Larry the boss
      EDUCATED
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2011
      • 90798
      • 6,419
      • 4,473
      • 2,500,480

      #3
      Yep next up Wade

      Comment

      • Eff Pandas
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2012
        • 52129
        • 3,624
        • 2,147
        • 1,635,919

        #4
        The NSAC has been getting tougher on bs fights lately. It wouldn't surprise me at all if they don't sanction a title fight at some point. And I wouldn't be surprised if its a IBF title fight cuz they seem to force a lot of bs fights like this one.

        Comment

        • b00g13man
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2012
          • 12197
          • 265
          • 51
          • 34,905

          #5
          Yep. Agreed.

          Comment

          • original zero
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2016
            • 2243
            • 69
            • 1
            • 9,551

            #6
            The IBF can't force people to fight for them that want to fight for them.

            The top two available and interested fighters face each other in an eliminator.

            The winner gets a title shot.

            As has been discussed before, top fighters don't like to fight for the IBF because the IBF won't bend the rules for top fighters.

            So you end up with mandatories that aren't top fighters.

            This is what happens when you're not corrupt. Top fighters won't fight for you.

            Comment

            • removed
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2008
              • 21479
              • 4,005
              • 831
              • 164,542

              #7
              Originally posted by original zero
              The IBF can't force people to fight for them that want to fight for them.

              The top two available and interested fighters face each other in an eliminator.

              The winner gets a title shot.

              As has been discussed before, top fighters don't like to fight for the IBF because the IBF won't bend the rules for top fighters.

              So you end up with mandatories that aren't top fighters.

              This is what happens when you're not corrupt. Top fighters won't fight for you.
              Their rankings are still terrible, however you try to spin it.

              Comment

              • techliam
                Caneloweight Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2012
                • 5526
                • 371
                • 23
                • 42,424

                #8
                Originally posted by denium
                Their rankings are still terrible, however you try to spin it.
                There is no spin there, what he said are just plain facts

                Their rankings are usually terrible, as top fighters would rather have corrupt leniency provided by other organisations. Why do you think Pacquiao held the WBO title for so long, and why Mayweather only cared about his WBC title - neither bothered with the IBF once they hit stardom.

                Their rankings do suck in some divisions, but its not their fault

                Comment

                • MrRolltide91
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Aug 2010
                  • 12208
                  • 167
                  • 1
                  • 30,631

                  #9
                  Originally posted by original zero
                  The IBF can't force people to fight for them that want to fight for them.

                  The top two available and interested fighters face each other in an eliminator.

                  The winner gets a title shot.

                  As has been discussed before, top fighters don't like to fight for the IBF because the IBF won't bend the rules for top fighters.

                  So you end up with mandatories that aren't top fighters.

                  This is what happens when you're not corrupt. Top fighters won't fight for you.


                  True.......

                  Comment

                  • The Gambler1981
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 25961
                    • 521
                    • 774
                    • 49,039

                    #10
                    On the plus side, a lot of their mismatches end real quick which tend to be less dangerous than sustained beatings.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP