Comments Thread For: Sanchez: Mayweather is Fixated on GGG, Keeps Talking About Him

[Szef]

Fighters get asked questions, they answer them accordingly.

Pretty much this.

[Zaroku]

Abel is full of crap.. Come to boxingscene. Spoon23 is fixated on Floyd, in slow motion & real time!!

[kbowie]

Same Fight

Fight would look like Mayweather Canelo all over again

[KillaMane26]

Oh like fixated on Ward

[hugh grant]

Fight would look like Mayweather Canelo all over again

At 154 many people think its highly possible, depending on what version of GGG shows up? But if dropping weight don't effect ggg too much GGG might do well, he is just more capable than nelo ever was.
At 160 most believe GGG destroys Floyd. Floyd don't like that but won't do anything to rectify that. He don't like to prove people wrong.

[aboutfkntime]

At 154 many people think its highly possible, depending on what version of GGG shows up? But if dropping weight don't effect ggg too much GGG might do well, he is just more capable than nelo ever was.
At 160 most believe GGG destroys Floyd. Floyd don't like that but won't do anything to rectify that. He don't like to prove people wrong.

For 5 years, YOU stated that Mayweather will NEVER enter the ring with a certain fighter, who shall remain nameless.....

..... then, YOU stated that the certain fighter mentioned above, who shall remain nameless, would beat him hands down.

In fact, you have said some amazingly dumb shht over the last 5 years or so.

Mayweather proved YOU wrong..... over-and-over-and-over

Which makes your post ridiculous in hindsight.

Did you really think we would forget ?

FWIW, I would favor Golovkin at 160, Floyd is no middleweight, or even close..... but you are absolutely dreaming if you think that Golovkin would be the same fighter at 154.

[hugh grant]

For 5 years, YOU stated that Mayweather will NEVER enter the ring with a certain fighter, who shall remain nameless.....

..... then, YOU stated that the certain fighter mentioned above, who shall remain nameless, would beat him hands down.

In fact, you have said some amazingly dumb shht over the last 5 years or so.

Mayweather proved YOU wrong..... over-and-over-and-over

Which makes your post ridiculous in hindsight.

Did you really think we would forget ?

FWIW, I would favor Golovkin at 160, Floyd is no middleweight, or even close..... but you are absolutely dreaming if you think that Golovkin would be the same fighter at 154.

Floyd doesn't prove people wriong. He is favoured to beat people on points and he invariably does.
Where he does sometimes prove people wrong is that he fights some of the people that a lot of people say he ducks. He might not fight them at the right time but thats another topic.
Just cos he eventually fights some of the people, people accuse him of ducking don't mean to say people think the person Floyd is duckjing is any good and its a great win and Floyd is great for beating the fighter people said he ducked.
At one point Floyd was barely fighting, that is why he was seen as a serial ducker. I'm sure at some point he's been accused of dodging jmm, baldomir, margarito, just about everyone.
Buts that's all down to Floyd and how he behaved, nobody else to blame.

[aboutfkntime]

Floyd doesn't prove people wriong. He is favoured to beat people on points and he invariably does.
Where he does sometimes prove people wrong is that he fights some of the people that a lot of people say he ducks. He might not fight them at the right time but thats another topic.
Just cos he eventually fights some of the people, people accuse him of ducking don't mean to say people think the person Floyd is duckjing is any good and its a great win and Floyd is great for beating the fighter people said he ducked.
At one point Floyd was barely fighting, that is why he was seen as a serial ducker. I'm sure at some point he's been accused of dodging jmm, baldomir, margarito, just about everyone.
Buts that's all down to Floyd and how he behaved, nobody else to blame.

You wouldn't have a clue hughie !


You've been following boxing for years, and yet you're still a pac-spastic !


When you actually love the sport, you will start to develop a clue.

[The Big Dunn]

Floyd doesn't prove people wriong. He is favoured to beat people on points and he invariably does.
Where he does sometimes prove people wrong is that he fights some of the people that a lot of people say he ducks. He might not fight them at the right time but thats another topic.
Just cos he eventually fights some of the people, people accuse him of ducking don't mean to say people think the person Floyd is duckjing is any good and its a great win and Floyd is great for beating the fighter people said he ducked.
At one point Floyd was barely fighting, that is why he was seen as a serial ducker. I'm sure at some point he's been accused of dodging jmm, baldomir, margarito, just about everyone.
Buts that's all down to Floyd and how he behaved, nobody else to blame.

He proved you wrong. then you cowardly tried to delete the post but fortunately it got sigged.