Comments Thread For: Frampton May Vacate WBA Belt, No Rigondeaux Defense

Collapse
X
Collapse
  • Page of 11
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 8 9 10 11 template Next
  • sicko
    The Truth Hurts
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2010
    • 34211
    • 2,594
    • 839
    • 151,307
    #101
    It is BS but I still think Rigo dropped the ball by not signing with Haymon given the landscape of his Division

      Comment

      • bigjavi973
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2013
        • 24007
        • 759
        • 1,480
        • 1,236,071
        #102
        Originally posted by kafkod
        It's too bad for Frampton that he's tight at 122, and Rigo isn't. Otherwise, Carl could have avoided the fight by insisting that it had to be at 119lbs or no deal, and you would have been fine with that, yeah?
        No I wouldn't. Besides Rigo could probably make it to 119

          Comment

          • BrometheusBob.
            All Time Great
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2015
            • 20457
            • 915
            • 1,915
            • 156,555
            #103
            lol @ anyone who defends this **** by calling Rigo boring. Frampton/Quigg wasn't exactly Morales/Barrera. Hell it wasn't even Khan/Algieri.

              Comment

              • b00g13man
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2012
                • 12197
                • 265
                • 51
                • 34,905
                #104
                Shameful ****, but expected.

                  Comment

                  Previous 1 8 9 10 11 template Next
                  Working...
                  TOP

                  Sign In

                  Forgot password?

                  Register

                  Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
                  JOIN NOW