Capability of sell PPVs.
The Definition of "A-Side", Heated Debate - Skills Or Popularity?
Collapse
-
-
-
-
If they ever rematched I think Froch is still the A-side.
E.g..
Pacquiao vs Bradley II - Pacquiao still the A-side
Ali vs Spinks II - Ali still the A-side
Lewis vs Rahman II - Lewis still the A-side
Cotto vs Margarito II - Cotto still the A-side
Even if you lose to a fighter, it doesn't necessarily mean you lose your A-side status to them..Comment
-
Disagree Froch lost he shouldn't be the a side a loss supercedes everything boxing is not about money it's about wins and losses..If they ever rematched I think Froch is still the A-side.
E.g..
Pacquiao vs Bradley II - Pacquiao still the A-side
Ali vs Spinks II - Ali still the A-side
Lewis vs Rahman II - Lewis still the A-side
Cotto vs Margarito II - Cotto still the A-side
Even if you lose to a fighter, it doesn't necessarily mean you lose your A-side status to them..Comment
-
But in all those examples I listed, the losing fighter is still the A-side because they still generated more money due to their popularity. Sometimes when a fighter beats an A-side guy, they themselves become the A-side but it's actually pretty rare I think. I guess Mayweather vs De La Hoya was an example of it happening because Floyd went on to become the highest paid boxer in history but in the De La Hoya fight he was the B-side guy back then.Comment
Comment