The Definition of "A-Side", Heated Debate - Skills Or Popularity?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BoliviaChiLEsp
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jan 2016
    • 545
    • 11
    • 0
    • 7,259

    #11
    Capability of sell PPVs.

    Comment

    • gmc_rfc_06
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2010
      • 9486
      • 282
      • 131
      • 16,947

      #12
      The A-side is the man who brings the money and fills the seats.

      Comment

      • LetOutTheCage
        Undisputed Champion
        • Jul 2015
        • 4314
        • 163
        • 314
        • 47,581

        #13
        I hate this term so much.

        Comment

        • daggum
          All time great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 43767
          • 4,685
          • 3
          • 166,270

          #14
          the a-side is the a-force audley harrison

          Comment

          • imperial1
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2008
            • 1541
            • 48
            • 0
            • 7,826

            #15
            Originally posted by Razcal26
            Before they fought? Froch.

            After they fought? Ward
            Yeah after they fought no doubt but I get people saying well Froch fought in front of 80 k blah blah blah

            Comment

            • FlatLine
              Lights out.
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2012
              • 5733
              • 318
              • 117
              • 36,496

              #16
              Originally posted by imperial1
              Ok the who should be the aside in this scenario

              Froch or Ward ?
              Originally posted by Razcal26
              Before they fought? Froch.

              After they fought? Ward
              If they ever rematched I think Froch is still the A-side.

              E.g..

              Pacquiao vs Bradley II - Pacquiao still the A-side

              Ali vs Spinks II - Ali still the A-side

              Lewis vs Rahman II - Lewis still the A-side

              Cotto vs Margarito II - Cotto still the A-side

              Even if you lose to a fighter, it doesn't necessarily mean you lose your A-side status to them..

              Comment

              • Redd Foxx
                Hittin' the heavy bag.
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2011
                • 22007
                • 1,180
                • 2,316
                • 1,257,197

                #17
                Originally posted by Weltschmerz
                Thread is redundant, what is this another troll attempt by flatline.
                Actually, as sad as it is, I don't think he knew the answer.

                Comment

                • NUCLEAR
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Sep 2015
                  • 788
                  • 45
                  • 6
                  • 11,093

                  #18
                  This a side b side fiasco is making current boxers act like primma donnas. Smh

                  Comment

                  • imperial1
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 1541
                    • 48
                    • 0
                    • 7,826

                    #19
                    Originally posted by FlatLine
                    If they ever rematched I think Froch is still the A-side.

                    E.g..

                    Pacquiao vs Bradley II - Pacquiao still the A-side

                    Ali vs Spinks II - Ali still the A-side

                    Lewis vs Rahman II - Lewis still the A-side

                    Cotto vs Margarito II - Cotto still the A-side

                    Even if you lose to a fighter, it doesn't necessarily mean you lose your A-side status to them..
                    Disagree Froch lost he shouldn't be the a side a loss supercedes everything boxing is not about money it's about wins and losses..

                    Comment

                    • FlatLine
                      Lights out.
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2012
                      • 5733
                      • 318
                      • 117
                      • 36,496

                      #20
                      Originally posted by imperial1
                      Disagree Froch lost he shouldn't be the a side a loss supercedes everything boxing is not about money it's about wins and losses..
                      But in all those examples I listed, the losing fighter is still the A-side because they still generated more money due to their popularity. Sometimes when a fighter beats an A-side guy, they themselves become the A-side but it's actually pretty rare I think. I guess Mayweather vs De La Hoya was an example of it happening because Floyd went on to become the highest paid boxer in history but in the De La Hoya fight he was the B-side guy back then.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP