Quigg-Frampton scoring...

[gmc_rfc_06]

Now, I'm not overly bothered by networks being biased towards their fighter, but there's something I need to question.

How did Jim Watt go from having Frampton 3 points ahead after 9 rounds to having him a point behind after 11?

Halling's commentary was the usual bias in favour of the Sky Sports backed guy, but that scoring is simply disgraceful. Looked like nothing more than trying to force the idea that a non-Frampton victory was acceptable

[Sparked_26]

Think Watt did a good job and trying to provide a compelling narrative (bizarre scoring n all).

That was a complete non-event for nearly all of it.

[#CaneloKhan]

lol I didnt even notice but obviously was in the bag trying to paint a picture and probably get a rematch acceptable.