I guess WBC but I think Ring is the most fair of the bunch......and should be more highly reguarded than these ABC corrupt orginizations.Don't get me wrong everyone is on an agenda but I think the Ring is relatively fair.
I thought that Ring was without a doubt the best. I also prefer it's look. That Olympic style red,white and blue is tight. It looks like a boxer utility belt.
to be perfectly honest after what the WBC and IBF have ordered recently...it's either WBA or WBO. Probably WBO if you do it by champions in each weight class...
1) Liakovich (by beating Brewster)
2) Calzaghe (longest reigning current champ, just crushed Lacy)
3) Margarito is longest reigning champ at welter and the best fighter other than Mayweather
4) Cotto is the best Jr. Welter right now
5) Freitas or Raheem (because Corrales chose to relinquish the belt. WBC ordering the rematch between Corrales and Castillo destroyed all their credibility)
and what about RICKY HITMAN HATTON and his WBU !! TITLE
Whats wrong with going back to the old days when each weight had only 1 championship belt that would eradicate all these paper champs and whoever held their weights could bee seen as the true champion
Whats wrong with going back to the old days when each weight had only 1 championship belt that would eradicate all these paper champs and whoever held their weights could bee seen as the true champion
More titles = more title fights = more viewers = more cash.
Comment