Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Apologizes For Comments on Gays; Mayweather Reacts

[Hype job]

You have an anti-black opinion and I don't crucify you.

[Tomjas]

a ****sexual wrote that. not that it can't be true... but... lol

It's a fact that a huge number of species engage in ****sexual acts

Manny doesn't know this because a box of rocks has more intelligence than he does

[HanzGruber]

You have an anti-black opinion and I don't crucify you.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

not cool taking shots at Floyd's f@gg0t ass fans, Manny...not cool

[Real King Kong]

Why do people get so up in arms about being compared to animals? With the track record of humans...it's a compliment

[SouthPawHitman]

Manny shouldn't have apologized. He was right. I'm not ****phobic in the slightest but Manny brings up great points.

[Teetotaler]

Was there any reason for mayweather to respond? I mean pacquiao didnt respond about his whole thing with PETA and the lion or whatever he was keeping. Lol i actually liked his response about how he rather listen to the lord than the flesh. But still kind of a religious nut kind of thing to say

[BrometheusBob.]

Let me reiterate this one more time. Nobody cares about your emotions. Whether you're "OK" with ****sexuality doesn't change whether or not it's a disorder.

Maternal hypersexuality is passed down as a mutation to male offspring who sometimes express it as an abnormal attraction to their own gender:

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/art...l.pone.0002282

"But I like it and think it's OK and good" isn't a valid argument. You can like whatever you want. Even if every human on Earth loved ****s it would still be a genetic mutation with correlating mental abnormalities thus a disorder.

I really like choking my girlfriend when I **** her and she likes it too. There's probably some underlying psychiatric disorder going on there. I'm not an insecure **** though so I don't really mind knowing it's a disorder.

However there's this strange large group of people obsessed with worshiping ****sexuals the way you're doing by elevating them above reality and denying they have any disorders. I think they bother me more than the actual ****s.

There are no major scientific/medical bodies that see ****sexuality as a disorder though.

[Rip Chudd]

He didn't apologize for he views. He said he's sorry for hurting people. Big difference

Yeah, didn't read that at first. I respect him for holding onto his views.

[bigjavi973]

You can have sex and not want to be a father.
When you use a condon and have sex with a woman, you are not having childs. Does it mean it's wrong? according to you its wrong.

An as5 h0le can serve to poop, but also to have sexual pleassure.
A womans mouth can serve to eat and breathe, but also so suck a ****. And it doesn't mean that it's unnatural. Are both things wrong then?

****sexuality DOES serve a purpose. The purpose of making love and be with the person you want to love. ****sexual people have feelings just like heterosexual people. As I said before, sex is not only to have children.

Why should we all love a person to have a child with it? doesn't make sense at all. Children will still be born because women and men will still have sex and make millions of new babies each year.

****sexuality does not harm anyone in any way.

You might try harder next time.

relax all I said it's not natural cuz they can't reproduce.... so according to this... being gay is..... just cuz they have sex? Cuz that's what you wrote.

Gay people want to get married, have kids (of course adopt, seminal implantation etc), raise those kids, grow old etc.....

Just like regular folks do. I have no problem with that at all, as I have stated before.