Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Apologizes For Comments on Gays; Mayweather Reacts

**Hype job** · 02-16-2016, 01:56 PM

Originally posted by PBP.

You have an anti-black opinion and I don't crucify you.

**Tomjas** · 02-16-2016, 01:58 PM

Originally posted by Twako

a ****sexual wrote that. not that it can't be true... but... lol

It's a fact that a huge number of species engage in ****sexual acts

Manny doesn't know this because a box of rocks has more intelligence than he does

**HanzGruber** · 02-16-2016, 01:58 PM

Originally posted by PBP.

You have an anti-black opinion and I don't crucify you.

Originally posted by Hype job

**-MAKAVELLI-** · 02-16-2016, 01:59 PM

not cool taking shots at Floyd's f@gg0t ass fans, Manny...not cool

**Real King Kong** · 02-16-2016, 02:00 PM

Why do people get so up in arms about being compared to animals? With the track record of humans...it's a compliment

**SouthPawHitman** · 02-16-2016, 02:08 PM

Manny shouldn't have apologized. He was right. I'm not ****phobic in the slightest but Manny brings up great points.

**Teetotaler** · 02-16-2016, 02:13 PM

Was there any reason for mayweather to respond? I mean pacquiao didnt respond about his whole thing with PETA and the lion or whatever he was keeping. Lol i actually liked his response about how he rather listen to the lord than the flesh. But still kind of a religious nut kind of thing to say

**BrometheusBob.** · 02-16-2016, 02:25 PM

Originally posted by Courage Award

Let me reiterate this one more time. Nobody cares about your emotions. Whether you're "OK" with ****sexuality doesn't change whether or not it's a disorder.

Maternal hypersexuality is passed down as a mutation to male offspring who sometimes express it as an abnormal attraction to their own gender:

Sexually Antagonistic Selection in Human Male Homosexuality

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002282

Several lines of evidence indicate the existence of genetic factors influencing male homosexuality and bisexuality. In spite of its relatively low frequency, the stable permanence in all human populations of this apparently detrimental trait constitutes a puzzling ‘Darwinian paradox’. Furthermore, several studies have pointed out relevant asymmetries in the distribution of both male homosexuality and of female fecundity in the parental lines of homosexual vs. heterosexual males. A number of hypotheses have attempted to give an evolutionary explanation for the long-standing persistence of this trait, and for its asymmetric distribution in family lines; however a satisfactory understanding of the population genetics of male homosexuality is lacking at present. We perform a systematic mathematical analysis of the propagation and equilibrium of the putative genetic factors for male homosexuality in the population, based on the selection equation for one or two diallelic loci and Bayesian statistics for pedigree investigation. We show that only the two-locus genetic model with at least one locus on the X chromosome, and in which gene expression is sexually antagonistic (increasing female fitness but decreasing male fitness), accounts for all known empirical data. Our results help clarify the basic evolutionary dynamics of male homosexuality, establishing this as a clearly ascertained sexually antagonistic human trait.

"But I like it and think it's OK and good" isn't a valid argument. You can like whatever you want. Even if every human on Earth loved ****s it would still be a genetic mutation with correlating mental abnormalities thus a disorder.

I really like choking my girlfriend when I **** her and she likes it too. There's probably some underlying psychiatric disorder going on there. I'm not an insecure **** though so I don't really mind knowing it's a disorder.

However there's this strange large group of people obsessed with worshiping ****sexuals the way you're doing by elevating them above reality and denying they have any disorders. I think they bother me more than the actual ****s.

There are no major scientific/medical bodies that see ****sexuality as a disorder though.

**Rip Chudd** · 02-16-2016, 02:27 PM

Originally posted by about.thousands

He didn't apologize for he views. He said he's sorry for hurting people. Big difference

Yeah, didn't read that at first. I respect him for holding onto his views.

**bigjavi973** · 02-16-2016, 02:28 PM

Originally posted by _Maxi

You can have sex and not want to be a father.
When you use a condon and have sex with a woman, you are not having childs. Does it mean it's wrong? according to you its wrong.

An as5 h0le can serve to poop, but also to have sexual pleassure.
A womans mouth can serve to eat and breathe, but also so suck a ****. And it doesn't mean that it's unnatural. Are both things wrong then?

****sexuality DOES serve a purpose. The purpose of making love and be with the person you want to love. ****sexual people have feelings just like heterosexual people. As I said before, sex is not only to have children.

Why should we all love a person to have a child with it? doesn't make sense at all. Children will still be born because women and men will still have sex and make millions of new babies each year.

****sexuality does not harm anyone in any way.

You might try harder next time.

relax all I said it's not natural cuz they can't reproduce.... so according to this... being gay is..... just cuz they have sex? Cuz that's what you wrote.

Gay people want to get married, have kids (of course adopt, seminal implantation etc), raise those kids, grow old etc.....

Just like regular folks do. I have no problem with that at all, as I have stated before.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Apologizes For Comments on Gays; Mayweather Reacts

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Sign In

Register