Who do you regard as the greatest southpaw of all-time?

[therealpugilist]

Mayweather did that to canelo with catchweights , he faced fighters after they were knocked out , he manipulated the drug testing procedures , he demanded different gloves and yet all I see is that's ok from you and he's still the greatest of the era lol......we know why lol......pacquaio won weights from 106 up to 154 lbs and beat almost every great of his era....tell me one fighter that has won that many belts in separate divsions...it's never been according to you blah blah.....look if Whitaker had done what he did then I would say him but he didn't and that's that....and pacquaio was the fighter if the decade by the scribes so I am also gonna say he's the greatest southpaw of Al time...that's it....that's rights bro different folks differnt strokes .....bygones be bygones

I've been a boxing fan across 4 decade...I dont need a writer to tell me who was the best or more dominant when all it takes is to look at their records and watch their fights.....Manny was not fighter of the decade...he was the most popular fighter of the decade.


fighters give the belts meaning...he fought david diaz, when nate campbell, Juan Diaz and better fighters were there...he took the easy route and anyone with a brain knows it

what do the belts really mean if you arent fighting the best in the divison


Mayweather is lineal in 4 divisons and fought across 5


Manny has won 4 but belts in 8 divisons...never fought the man at 122, 135, 154, etc.....fought David Diaz when 135 was friggin loaded with talent, fought 1 time at 140, and since he has been at 147 he has fought junior welterweights moving up to face him.....great fighter but overrated.....just my honest opinion......did floyd ever win a title versus a fighter that wasnt a top ten ranked contender and vacant at that?

[The plunger man]

bwahahahahaha...who did the voting.....Floyd said it best....sorry bro....they wanted Manny to be fighter of the decade and the best of the era...he wasnt....losing to Erik Morales and never beating marquez cleanly killed his claim...Floyd was far more dominant and beat their common opponents clearly in the decade and before Manny did

U have just proved my point lol...posting mayweather talking ...Jesus unreal....and listen I'm not the one warned on my profile about keep trolling and getting threatend witha. Permanent ban by a moderator....it's you not me.....my heroes in boxing are Ray leonard , Joe Louis , Ali ,LEWIS ,pacquaio,hearns,duran ....urs are bro,bro,bro...ummm let me think bro....pacquaio in my opinion is the greatest southpaw of all time...end of

[therealpugilist]

U have just proved my point lol...posting mayweather talking ...Jesus unreal....and listen I'm not the one warned on my profile about keep trolling and getting threatend witha. Permanent ban by a moderator....it's you not me.....my heroes in boxing are Ray leonard , Joe Louis , Ali ,LEWIS ,pacquaio,hearns,duran ....urs are bro,bro,bro...ummm let me think bro....pacquaio in my opinion is the greatest southpaw of all time...end of

you dumby...he made a good point.....how was he fighter of the decade when mayweather was a champion over a decade and undefeated, also whitewashed his biggest rival and beat his best opponents before Manny



to each own...in my opinion Manny is ONE of the greatest southpaws and One of the greatest fighters of the 2000s and ONE of the greatest of his era...just not the best like the media tried to force feed people....in the ring is the squared circle of truth and Floyd was more dominant than Manny in the 2000s

[IMDAZED]

And of course this thread is about Floyd now.

Site is so damn pathetic sometimes.

Anyway, Pernell Whitaker FTW

[The plunger man]

I've been a boxing fan across 4 decade...I dont need a writer to tell me who was the best or more dominant when all it takes is to look at their records and watch their fights.....Manny was not fighter of the decade...he was the most popular fighter of the decade.


fighters give the belts meaning...he fought david diaz, when nate campbell, Juan Diaz and better fighters were there...he took the easy route and anyone with a brain knows it

what do the belts really mean if you arent fighting the best in the divison


Mayweather is lineal in 4 divisons and fought across 5


Manny has won 4 but belts in 8 divisons...never fought the man at 122, 135, 154, etc.....fought David Diaz when 135 was friggin loaded with talent, fought 1 time at 140, and since he has been at 147 he has fought junior welterweights moving up to face him.....great fighter but overrated.....just my honest opinion......did floyd ever win a title versus a fighter that wasnt a top ten ranked contender and vacant at that?

And so have I ......pacquaios IMO and that's that....again mayweather with marquez,ortiz,guerrero.....mosley was old...so was Oscar....he brought HATTON up from another weight , IV injections , cherry picking berto, we can all pick other fighters records apart but you have a special preference if the skin colour is not black then u seem to hone in on it.....shame really but it's always the usual faces ....omowale tribe, imdazed, the real pugilist,T.M.T ....ur part of the groovy gang

[The plunger man]

you dumby...he made a good point.....how was he fighter of the decade when mayweather was a champion over a decade and undefeated, also whitewashed his biggest rival and beat his best opponents before Manny



to each own...in my opinion Manny is ONE of the greatest southpaws and One of the greatest fighters of the 2000s and ONE of the greatest of his era...just not the best like the media tried to force feed people....in the ring is the squared circle of truth and Floyd was more dominant than Manny in the 2000s

This about a soutpaw and who you think was the best...I said pacquaio and you tried to convince me otherwise lol....you started picking records apart to suit your agenda and I counterpunched u with a fighter you consider he best and pulled his record apart....if u knock at the Devils door he's gonna answer ....my opinion is as stand for southpaw
1 pacquaio
2 hagler
3 Whitaker
4 hector Camacho
5 JOE calazghe And that's that.....

[stuff jones]

race has nothing to do about it.....Pac is overrated, he is an ATG but definitely not top 20 or the greatest of the era like the media tried to make him out to be


He is definitely top ten, top 5...not the best....too many wins with catchweights, fighters coming off tko losses, bad showings...its not always the who you beat, but when you beat them.....A lot of his biggest wins are after fighters lost or looked bad on the highest level....his first win over Morales was after he lost....Margarito was battered by mosley year lay off, fights a no name, then pac fights him next....mosley was 1-1-1 in his last 3 fights and hadnt won a fight in 2 or more years.....OLDH was fighting under 150 for the first time in 7 years


Great fighter, never bought in to the crazy hype....different folks different strokes

What if he was black?

[SilverMiles]

This about a soutpaw and who you think was the best...I said pacquaio and you tried to convince me otherwise lol....you started picking records apart to suit your agenda and I counterpunched u with a fighter you consider he best and pulled his record apart....if u knock at the Devils door he's gonna answer ....my opinion is as stand for southpaw
1 pacquaio
2 hagler
3 Whitaker
4 hector Camacho
5 JOE calazghe And that's that.....

Guys like Real Pugilist are the cancer of this site, can't have a civil discussion without some idiot coming in and trying to discredit certain fighters due to their own insecurities.

And to answer TS question, I have it a tie between Hagler and Manny. Hard for me to chose one over the other. If I was forced to pick I would probably rank Manny first then Hagler.

[therealpugilist]

What if he was black?

he'd still have the same record and still be ONE of the best of his generation....race agendas are for trolls....sorry bro...bad attempt at trolling

[therealpugilist]

Guys like Real Pugilist are the cancer of this site, can't have a civil discussion without some idiot coming in and trying to discredit certain fighters due to their own insecurities.

And to answer TS question, I have it a tie between Hagler and Manny. Hard for me to chose one over the other. If I was forced to pick I would probably rank Manny first then Hagler.

If Im the cancer youre the AIDS of this site...d!ckrider...I said nothing to discredit him...just pointed out that after he moved past 130 he fought several guys after bad losses....am i lying...since Im not STFU