Why do Floyd fans says the IV infusion was not illegal?

[Zaroku]

Good morning Larry.

Hahahahaha LMAO!!!

[krazyn8tive]

The lunacy of a retroactive waiver...smh. Do you know how many people in prison wish they had one of those? Hahaha it is absolutely absurd.

[Rath]

Let me know when you find that law. Until then don't respond to me.

you said it was legal and that is good.

then a follow up question was what's the TUE for if it was legal in the first place.

then you go crazy on me.

[Rath]

How? Same topic covered there.

there are thousand of threads that have the same topics and talk about same issues.

this is just a specific topic that talks about the legality of the IV on the night of the fight.

what;s your point?

answer the simple question please.

[Lester Tutor]

''Mayweather also applied for, and was given, a the****utic use exemption (TUE) for rehydration purposes after the May 1 weigh-in. He took two separate mixes. The first was a mixture of 250 ml of saline and multi-vitamins. The second was a 500 ml mixuture of saline and Vitamin C. He was urine tested both before and after taking the solutions.

Nevada rules permit the mixes that Mayweather took, but because USADA was overseeing the testing he applied for and was granted the TUE for them.

All tests came back negative.'' - Kevin Iole May 22 (Yahoo Sports)

follow up week after.... Kevin Iole forgets that it was illegal.... fast forward 2 months later. #49. Hauser attempts to amplify the suspension of disbelief because Iole failed to insinuate the obvious... ''illegalism''

[Rath]

''Mayweather also applied for, and was given, a the****utic use exemption (TUE) for rehydration purposes after the May 1 weigh-in. He took two separate mixes. The first was a mixture of 250 ml of saline and multi-vitamins. The second was a 500 ml mixuture of saline and Vitamin C. He was urine tested both before and after taking the solutions.

Nevada rules permit the mixes that Mayweather took, but because USADA was overseeing the testing he applied for and was granted the TUE for them.

All tests came back negative.'' - Kevin Iole May 22 (Yahoo Sports)

follow up week after.... Kevin Iole forgets that it was illegal.... fast forward 2 months later. #49. Hauser attempts to amplify the suspension of disbelief because Iole failed to insinuate the obvious... ''illegalism''

after may 1 means 19 days later

spin it genius floyd fan

[Rath]

''Why do Floyd fans says the IV infusion was not illegal?'' -kid OP

1.) the Pac sobbers claim Floyd wasn't dehydrated, the theories explode with weight coverage throughout the years...

2.) Hauser doesn't once say that an IV is illegal, the cute drama from which the OP was influenced by, no, Hauser suggests that oral could've been done alone...

the USADA does not once said floyd wad dehydrated.

LOL

[Poloro87]

Its an iv fusion of vitamins big deal that defitnely affected the outcome of the fight. Pacquiao would have won the fight without it. Its no different then a figter failing a drug test after the fight. If the commision finds something is illegal then they change the decision to a no contest and suspends/ fine the fighter After the fight. None of this happened.

[b00g13man]

[BoxingIsGreat]

there are thousand of threads that have the same topics and talk about same issues.

this is just a specific topic that talks about the legality of the IV on the night of the fight.

what;s your point?

answer the simple question please.

My point is, it's against the rules to make redundant threads.