Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

David Haye vs Shannon Briggs

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by BigAlexSand View Post
    I personally think it would be hilarious to see Briggs KO Haye within 6. And if Briggs could take a 12 round beating from a real monster in Vitali; what the f*** makes people think Haye will KO him.

    I didn't know Haye posses the same power, Lennox Lewis did.
    Chisora could take a 12 round "beating" from Vitali, but couldnt last five against haye, just saying.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by BigAlexSand View Post
      I personally think it would be hilarious to see Briggs KO Haye within 6. And if Briggs could take a 12 round beating from a real monster in Vitali; what the f*** makes people think Haye will KO him.

      I didn't know Haye posses the same power, Lennox Lewis did.
      You're talking as if time isn't a thing.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Beyonce Bomber View Post
        Huh? Have I entered bizarro world? It's anything but a pickem fight.
        Right, because Haye has been such a destroyer as of late. Briggs an Haye at this point are below standard, thus they are both equally pathetic despite Shannon being 86 years old.

        Comment


        • #14
          David "Hayemaker" Haye

          Defense-7
          Power-9
          Chin-6
          Stamina-9
          Bark/Chest Beating-10
          Bite-10

          Shannon "The Canon" Briggs

          Defense-6
          Power-9
          Chin-8
          Stamina-3
          Bark/Chest Beating-12
          Bite-4

          Prediction- Briggs does a LOT of barking at potential opponents, crashing their press conferences ...but he has a very low output in the ring. Haye probably out works him for a UD.

          Comment


          • #15
            It would be an interesting fight.

            Comment


            • #16
              Briggs gets sparked, briggs loses to anyone in the top 15.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by jri9d0 View Post
                Right, because Haye has been such a destroyer as of late. Briggs an Haye at this point are below standard, thus they are both equally pathetic despite Shannon being 86 years old.
                Right, because Haye at 35 is the same as Briggs at 45.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by BodiesInFlight View Post
                  Right, because Haye at 35 is the same as Briggs at 45.
                  You are missing the point just like the other knuckle head I responded to earlier. Haye's inactivity combined with his less than steller outings verse pretty much the same with Briggs with the only difference being age makes this fight a pickem's amongst pathetic's.

                  Makes sense now?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by jri9d0 View Post
                    You are missing the point just like the other knuckle head I responded to earlier. Haye's inactivity combined with his less than steller outings verse pretty much the same with Briggs with the only difference being age makes this fight a pickem's amongst pathetic's.

                    Makes sense now?
                    Not really. Briggs is older and has taken much more of a beating in his career than David Haye.
                    Just because Haye has been inactive doesn't make him as bad as Briggs.

                    If this fight get's made let's see if the bookies think it's a pickem fight.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP