Which is The Better Fight: Canelo vs. Khan or GGG vs. Wade?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -PBP-
    32 Time World Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2012
    • 24107
    • 836
    • 635
    • 34,297

    #1

    Which is The Better Fight: Canelo vs. Khan or GGG vs. Wade?

    So instead of a middleweight championship fight between the "champion" and the #1 contender, we get these matchups. Which of these fights is the lesser of 2 evils?
    11
    Canelo vs. Khan
    45.45%
    5
    Golovkin vs. Wade
    54.55%
    6
  • j0zef
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Oct 2015
    • 8440
    • 645
    • 767
    • 45,501

    #2
    Both are bad. But I do think that a much bigger guy picking on a little guy is much worse. Not only is it worth, but it's dangerous.

    Wade's actually decently rated (top 10 in most standings), but he's just not experienced enough yet.

    Comment

    • Luiz
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2013
      • 2010
      • 115
      • 49
      • 8,460

      #3
      At least Wade earned his fight with the champ.

      Comment

      • Scipio2009
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2014
        • 13741
        • 276
        • 64
        • 98,172

        #4
        Golovkin-Wade, for the simple fact that Wade seems to be a solid enough middleweight, with the only hanging being the appearance that he's getting the shot a bit too soon (Wade was on the fast track, up until he layed that egg against Soliman, leading folks to think he needed to get some more experience; put him in with Daniel Geale, before then putting him in with Hassan N'Dam, and Wade would be ready to go).

        Alvarez-Khan is a terrible matchup

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP