Kell Brook: "If I Don't Get The Khan Fight This Year I'm Retiring!" (VIDEO)

[gmc_rfc_06]

Then why did he duck Chaves and Alexander (twice). Why did he pull out negotiations with Bradley, Rios and why did he admit he doesn't want to fight Thurman..?

Actions speak louder than words.. He doesn't want the "big fights", he just wants the Khan payday. He has had many opportunities to have "big fights" and he always ducks out of them..

Man, you guys are deluded.

He and Alexander both pulled out of that fight with injuries. He came back from the injury, went to America and beat the guy that smacked Alexander around. A much better win against a much better opponent.

I love the revisionist way of talking about Chavez. When the fight was made you all said it was a terrible fight, then after the injury it became a difficult fight. Brook has given Hearn a pretty clear and serious message, it should force Hearn to make a big fight instead of settling.

As for Rios, it was team Rios who pulled out of the fight to take the Bradley fight instead as it was for more money and in the US.

Honestly, how sad do you have to be to just make stuff up?

[LacedUp]

Man, you guys are deluded.

He and Alexander both pulled out of that fight with injuries. He came back from the injury, went to America and beat the guy that smacked Alexander around. A much better win against a much better opponent.

I love the revisionist way of talking about Chavez. When the fight was made you all said it was a terrible fight, then after the injury it became a difficult fight. Brook has given Hearn a pretty clear and serious message, it should force Hearn to make a big fight instead of settling.

As for Rios, it was team Rios who pulled out of the fight to take the Bradley fight instead as it was for more money and in the US.

Honestly, how sad do you have to be to just make stuff up?

Correct on every point.

Especially that they are deluded.

[FlatLine]

Man, you guys are deluded.

He and Alexander both pulled out of that fight with injuries. He came back from the injury, went to America and beat the guy that smacked Alexander around. A much better win against a much better opponent.

I love the revisionist way of talking about Chavez. When the fight was made you all said it was a terrible fight, then after the injury it became a difficult fight. Brook has given Hearn a pretty clear and serious message, it should force Hearn to make a big fight instead of settling.

As for Rios, it was team Rios who pulled out of the fight to take the Bradley fight instead as it was for more money and in the US.

Honestly, how sad do you have to be to just make stuff up?

Excuses, excuses. Brook ducked Alexander twice in a row with a fake "injury" and Porter was a much easier style for him than Alexander would have been because Porter just rushes in. That's why Julio Diaz beat him in the first fight easy. So how high must you rate Diaz then if you think so highly of Porter... Brook only fought Porter because he knew the style match up would be easier and he just followed the Diaz game plan to beat him. The blueprint was already there.

Rios didn't pull out of the fight, Hearn said either fight with these gloves or no fight so he ended the negotiations by making ludicrous demands. Another fighter Brook avoided. And more fake "injury" excuses for ducking Chaves, at least he would be a better fighter than every fighter Brook has faced since the Porter fight.

Do you realize that supporting Brook is forcing you guys to make excuses for him almost on a continuous basis? I mean really, what has Brook turned you into? Just look at yourselves.. Lol..

[gmc_rfc_06]

Excuses, excuses. Brook ducked Alexander twice in a row with a fake "injury" and Porter was a much easier style for him than Alexander would have been because Porter just rushes in. That's why Julio Diaz beat him in the first fight easy. So how high must you rate Diaz then if you think so highly of Porter... Brook only fought Porter because he knew the style match up would be easier and he just followed the Diaz game plan to beat him. The blueprint was already there.

Rios didn't pull out of the fight, Hearn said either fight with these gloves or no fight so he ended the negotiations by making ludicrous demands. Another fighter Brook avoided. And more fake "injury" excuses for ducking Chaves, at least he would be a better fighter than every fighter Brook has faced since the Porter fight.

Do you realize that supporting Brook is forcing you guys to make excuses for him almost on a continuous basis? I mean really, what has Brook turned you into? Just look at yourselves.. Lol..

Alexander is a far easier style for Brook, stop talking absolute nonsense. A tiny welterweight with no power, who stays at distance and has had his ass beat multiple times. Porter's style was a far bigger challenge, he was coming off career best performances (including dominating Alexander) and was a heavy favourite.

Rios did pull out of the fight, don't resort to flat out lies. He wanted to use gloves that are banned in the UK, didn't get permission and instead took the Bradley fight. A Khan fan mentioning 'ludicrous' demands is hysterical though, you're always good for a laugh.

[FlatLine]

Alexander is a far easier style for Brook, stop talking absolute nonsense. A tiny welterweight with no power, who stays at distance and has had his ass beat multiple times. Porter's style was a far bigger challenge, he was coming off career best performances (including dominating Alexander) and was a heavy favourite.

Rios did pull out of the fight, don't resort to flat out lies. He wanted to use gloves that are banned in the UK, didn't get permission and instead took the Bradley fight. A Khan fan mentioning 'ludicrous' demands is hysterical though, you're always good for a laugh.

What? Lol.. You guys are some of the most delusional boxing fans to ever use a Qwerty keyboard... How exactly did Porter "dominate Alexander"? Explain that one to me , this'll be good..
Do you even know how to judge a fight? lol

"Dominated Alexander.." .. Is this a boxing forum or a bad joke forum?

These Brook fans just can't help exposing themselves for what they are, making up all these excuses and exaggerating the truth to comedic levels.. But they always provide some light entertainment so keep it coming..

[M Bison]

Kell the special excuse Brook

[FlatLine]

Kell the special excuse Brook

Lol.. Snapshot of a Kell "Special Needs" Brook fan after Bizier was announced as an opponent:

[Box-Office]

Aaand in the same time Khan has fought.... ? A guy coming off the most embarrassing one-sided beatdown over 12 rounds ever seen in the history of the sport and made him look like he was Marvin Hagler.

#levels

Against the guy arguably second best fighter of our era, wow, how embarrassing.


Algieri was a World Champion and beat Provodnikov who arguably beat Bradley. Out of soon to be 36 opponents Algieri would be clearly the second best guy on Brook's resume.

[BodiesInFlight]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't seen any criticism over Brook's horrendous opposition nor for him basing his entire career around cashing out on a Khan fight. Not to mention him ducking Bradley few yrs back, Alexander and then shafting Chaves big time. We can safely conclude the same for you.

Why would i be going around talking about something that happened years ago?

I have openly stated at the end of last year that 2015 was a pathetic year for Brook. No fanboy defence from me.

I just want the god damned fight to happen as it's going to be a huge UK fight, but all i see you and your buddy Frankie Bruno doing is telling everyone why it shouldn't happen.

[Box-Office]

Why would i be going around talking about something that happened years ago?

I have openly stated at the end of last year that 2015 was a pathetic year for Brook. No fanboy defence from me.

I just want the god damned fight to happen as it's going to be a huge UK fight, but all i see you and your buddy Frankie Bruno doing is telling everyone why it shouldn't happen.

Good man.


No, I just feel Garcia is a better win to have on your resume for obvious reasons.