Originally posted by Chollo Vista
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Debunking the PBC fighters can't fight on HBO Theory Myth and GGG's HBO contract
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Rath View Posthence my question.
if you are a company with rosters of fighters, then what are you?
Think of PBC as UFC in a sense that PBC buys TV time. PBC is nothing more than a TV series show; hence Premiere Boxing Champions, in which they have bought air time from other networks to market their fighters.
If GGG was the smart business man he claims to be, he would go to the Al Haymon stable. If Robert Guerrero gets 1.2 million to fight on free tv, how much do you think Golovkin would get?
Now, the counterargument to what Haymon is doing is buying up all the tv time in an effort to potentially block out the other promoters like Top Rank and Golden Boy. But, the good thing for them is HBO backs them up. That's the counter to what Haymon is doing.
But from listening to Team Golovkin, there goal is to make as much $$$ as possible, if this is the case, they need to be with PBC for PBC is creating the bigger stable of fighters and offers the most money.Last edited by Chollo Vista; 01-26-2016, 09:43 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by deanrw View PostHBO has invested heavily in GGG and built his name as part of their brand. If the situation was forced due to a failed purse bid like Lomachenko vs Russell, yes it can happen. It will not ever happen in a good faith type of way. HBO does not like Haymon and vice versa no matter what public hyperbole is released by either of them.
If Jacobs made 1.5 mil against Quillin on Showtime, not only will GGG get his biggest payday with PBC/Haymon, but he'll also be fighting the best which is what they've always claimed to want, no?
Boxing is a business and GGG doesn't owe HBO anything. Want to know why? Because if GGG goes on a losing streatk, HBO would have no problem kicking him to the curb. So it's actually in GGG's best interest to go with PBC/Haymon. Especially since Tom Loeffler likes Al Haymon and has no problem doing business with him.
Think about it: Better, more competitive fights and more $$$.
GGG has already met his 4 fight min contractual obligation with HBO. It's in his best interest to part ways with them and go where the money and better fights are.Last edited by Chollo Vista; 01-26-2016, 11:29 PM.
Comment
-
If there is money to be made they will make the fight regardless of relationship. The problem is finding a suitable fighter who is marketable and fan friendly to cross that divide.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rath View PostHaymon is neither a manager or a promoter for Floyd.
Floyd is his own boss and Ellerbe is his manager
Floyd has his own promotion company TMT so he is not promoting floyd.
Haymon as far as i know is Floyd's "adviser".
Maidana too has his own manager
so Haymon is an adviser to floyd and a manager for other fighters?
is there such a thing as adviser/manager?
Of course any deal with Floyd will be different because of the tremendous revenue he generates, and his own business interests as you indicated.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chollo Vista View PostPBC is kind of taking the UFC model of organizing fights.
Think of PBC as UFC in a sense that PBC buys TV time. PBC is nothing more than a TV series show; hence Premiere Boxing Champions, in which they have bought air time from other networks to market their fighters.
If GGG was the smart business man he claims to be, he would go to the Al Haymon stable. If Robert Guerrero gets 1.2 million to fight on free tv, how much do you think Golovkin would get?
Now, the counterargument to what Haymon is doing is buying up all the tv time in an effort to potentially block out the other promoters like Top Rank and Golden Boy. But, the good thing for them is HBO backs them up. That's the counter to what Haymon is doing.
But from listening to Team Golovkin, there goal is to make as much $$$ as possible, if this is the case, they need to be with PBC for PBC is creating the bigger stable of fighters and offers the most money.
but unlike UFC who have their own belts/champions, PBC has none.
PBC is using WBC, WBA, IBF, WBO's records of fights and belts/champion for their own benefit to promote their fight/fighters yet one of their true intentions is to eliminate boxing organizations like WBC and WBA etc.
i remember them saying there will be PBC belts/champions.
you can not just define PBC as "kinda like" UFC and "kinda like" TR or GBP
that is why my question is What exactly is PBC, not what is PBC "kinda like" ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scott9945 View PostWell you can call yourself anything. But the bottom line is that Haymon takes a percentage of his fighter's inflated purses, which are paid for by a hedge fund. Sounds like a manager to me.
Of course any deal with Floyd will be different because of the tremendous revenue he generates, and his own business interests as you indicated.
thanks a lot sir.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chollo Vista View PostIf GGG is about making smart business moves and fighting the best then going to PBC would be the most logical thing to do, no?
If Jacobs made 1.5 mil against Quillin on Showtime, not only will GGG get his biggest payday with PBC/Haymon, but he'll also be fighting the best which is what they've always claimed to want, no?
Boxing is a business and GGG doesn't owe HBO anything. Want to know why? Because if GGG goes on a losing streatk, HBO would have no problem kicking him to the curve. So it's actually in GGG's best interest to go with PBC/Haymon. Especially since Tom Loeffler likes Al Haymon and has no problem doing business with him.
Think about it: Better, more competitive fights and more $$$.
GGG has already met his 4 fight min contractual obligation with HBO. It's in his best interest to part ways with them and go where the money and better fights are.
Point blank he would still have to fight Wade. It is not like there are no fights to be made for GGG right now in HBO land. The issue is getting guys to actually fight him. Moving over to PBC is not guaranteed success as they are not even fighting each other. Look at the super welterweight division as an example. None of them are fighting each other or any live dogs for that matter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rath View Post
PBC is using WBC, WBA, IBF, WBO's records of fights and belts/champion for their own benefit to promote their fight/fighters yet one of their true intentions is to eliminate boxing organizations like WBC and WBA etc.
Originally posted by Rath View Post
you can not just define PBC as "kinda like" UFC and "kinda like" TR or GBP
that is why my question is What exactly is PBC, not what is PBC "kinda like" ?
Again, PBC is nothing more than Al Haymon's boxing series. It's nothing more than a boxing series tv show that provides a platform for him to market his fighters. That's all it is is a name of a sitcom if you will.
There are several promoters/managers that fall under the Haymon umbrella that are allowed to promote fights for the boxing series like Lou DiBella. Think of it like Bob Arum putting on a show during the airing of a PBC event.
PBC isn't a promotional company. All PBC is is the name of a boxing series similar to how Tuesday Night Fights was on ESPN back in the day.
Lou DiBella is the promoter in most events.Last edited by Chollo Vista; 01-26-2016, 10:03 PM.
Comment
-
Comment