Peterson Should Have Gotten th Decision Over Danny Because...

[betmen]

Oh, okay. No problem, then.

forum rivalry

[SilverMiles]

TS is a moron, look at his ******ed opening post he said to give 10-10 on the score card for the first three rounds and contradict it by giving Peterson 10-8 in round 11 & 12, he said he give peterson 10-8 in round 11 &12 because of peterson more dominance compare to 10-9 rounds danny's have in the first three rounds.

but aren't he Give both fighters 10-10 for the first 3 rounds???!! he's destroying his own logic

So this is TS score card : peterson-garcia
round 1 10-10 darw because both fighter didn't do ****
round 2 10-10 draw
round 3 10-10 draw
round 4 9-10 garcia
round 5 9-10 garcia
round 6 9-10 garcia
round 7 9-10 garcia
round 8 9-10 garcia
round 9 10-9 peterson
round 10 10-9 peterson
round 11 10-8 peterson
round 12 10-8 petersson

Winner peterson 115-114, but he gave peterson 10-8 rounds because he's more dominance than danny's 10-9 three first rounds, but he didn't gave danny 10-9 in the first three rounds.

10-Point Must System in professional bouts. This system assigns ten points to the winner of each round. The loser receives nine points for a close round, eight points if he was knocked down or dominated, and seven points if he was knocked down twice and so on. If a round is even and neither boxer was knocked down, both boxers receive 10 points. If each boxer was knocked down once, the knockdowns are disregarded and the winner of the round receives 10 points, while the loser receives nine points.

here the video of the 12th round of that fight



Do you think Peterson dominated danny in the 12?? , danny land almost the same amount punches as peterson in the 12 round though peterson land the harder more significant punches. That is not a 10-8 round it was just regular 10-9 round.

10-8 round is the 9th round of pac-morales 2 before pac knock him out

I think you critical thinking is failing you.

First I'm saying 10-10 and 10-8 should be used more often to reflect the true nature of the fight. Even rounds should be scored as such and one sided rounds should be scored as such.

Second im talking about the reality of the fight were judges gave Garcia 10-9 for round one and gave Peterson 10-9 for the 12th. Not fair considered the way the rounds were won. Either scored close rounds 10-10 or score dominate rounds 10-8 or so both. But never should even rounds and a dominate round be scored the same.

Third you don't seem to grasp the concept of 10 point must system. It's just require you to have 10 points for one fighter but it's perfectly fine to score 10-10. A judge could score every round 10-10 if he wanted too.

Also landing the same amount and being effective isn't the same. Peterson hurt Garcia pretty badly.

I know a lot of people are use to the ****** way judges score fights, and yes this makes the math a little more difficult but none of that matters. Scores should reflect the true nature of the fight.

One of the best scoring decisions I've seen in years is the judge who scored a round even in favor of Lee because he saw there was no knockdown and Quillin didn't deserve an extra point.

We need more judges like that using critical thinking and not filling in blanks 10-9.