Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Loeffler: Jacobs Bigger and Matches Better w/Golovkin Than Alvarez

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Bump.

    If no Canelo, we want Daniel Jacobs next. Not Ramirez.

    Jacobs is in his own division and is The Ring's #1 MW.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post
      http://******.craveonline.com/news/4...weekend-review

      Tom Loeffler, who promotes Triple-G, said he’s open to a fight against Jacobs. “That becomes very big if both fighters keep winning,” he said. I think Jacobs matches up better with Golovkin than Alvarez does because he’s naturally bigger and has a better amateur foundation, although the Mexican might have a better chin. … I don’t think the knockout loss will be as damaging to Quillin’s career as one might assume. Sometimes even the best fighters get caught with a big shot, as Jacobs did in his knockout lose to Dmitry Pirog in 2010. It happens. And the controversial nature of the stoppage mitigates the loss to some degree. I think Quillin (32-1-1, 23 KOs) remains one of the best 160-pounders in the world. He’ll bounce back quickly. … As always, it made me sick to hear the broadcasters refer to Jacobs-Quillin as a title fight. It wasn’t. Jacobs holds the bogus WBA “regular” title, which was invented so the sanctioning body could collect additional fees. Everyone knows that Golovkin is the actual WBA champ. The “regular” belt means about as much as the belt I bought on sale at Macy’s last week. In other words, it means nothing. Blow-by-blow man Mauro Ranallo ultimately did label the proliferation of belts “ridiculous.” Kudos to him.

      Makes sense why they're in such a hurry to get to purse bid

      God, I hope the WBA increases the split to 70-30 so we'll have a fight

      Comment


      • #13
        I'm sorry but Canelo is a better fighter than Jacobs, there is zero doubt in my mind.

        That is not to say Jacobs isn't a good fighter, and it isn't a good appetiser before Canelo-GGG. But make no mistake he isn't the major threat - this is just hype. He has punchers chance in the first 2-3 rounds, thats it. It is a step up in competition for GGG though and he needs that for his own credibility.

        Comment


        • #14
          Loeffler knows what's coming

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
            Isn't Jacobs a Haymon fighter? I thought those were totally off limits for GGG.

            Or is that excuse only used when Erislandy Lara's name is brought up?
            Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
            You already know...
            Just LOL at these fools ^^^

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post
              Loeffler knows what's coming
              Easy payday, that's what coming
              .

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post
                http://******.craveonline.com/news/4...weekend-review

                Tom Loeffler, who promotes Triple-G, said he’s open to a fight against Jacobs. “That becomes very big if both fighters keep winning,” he said. I think Jacobs matches up better with Golovkin than Alvarez does because he’s naturally bigger and has a better amateur foundation, although the Mexican might have a better chin. … I don’t think the knockout loss will be as damaging to Quillin’s career as one might assume. Sometimes even the best fighters get caught with a big shot, as Jacobs did in his knockout lose to Dmitry Pirog in 2010. It happens. And the controversial nature of the stoppage mitigates the loss to some degree. I think Quillin (32-1-1, 23 KOs) remains one of the best 160-pounders in the world. He’ll bounce back quickly. … As always, it made me sick to hear the broadcasters refer to Jacobs-Quillin as a title fight. It wasn’t. Jacobs holds the bogus WBA “regular” title, which was invented so the sanctioning body could collect additional fees. Everyone knows that Golovkin is the actual WBA champ. The “regular” belt means about as much as the belt I bought on sale at Macy’s last week. In other words, it means nothing. Blow-by-blow man Mauro Ranallo ultimately did label the proliferation of belts “ridiculous.” Kudos to him.
                Haven't been around as much lately, but you and Cobra straight spookin people. lol Good stuff

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
                  Haven't been around as much lately, but you and Cobra straight spookin people. lol Good stuff
                  How's everything been, bruh? Where you been

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                    Isn't Jacobs a Haymon fighter? I thought those were totally off limits for GGG.

                    Or is that excuse only used when Erislandy Lara's name is brought up?
                    ggg has already fought haymon fighters with no belt org forcing it. the only promoter now in the way of making fights is gbp alone

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Controversial KO? How high is Loeffler?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP