Comments Thread For: Roach: Crawford is Lying, Postol Would Never Turn Him Down

[jqSide]

I'll also note that Boxing Scene had an article the other day where it was claimed that insiders in Pacquiao's camp said Manny turned down the Crawford fight. Supposedly to spite Arum.

Extremely biased poster who picks and choose what he wants to believe without any attempt at using common sense. So many articles have appeared indicating Arum was justifying why Pacquiao is right in picking Bradley, ie, approved by HBO, cable operators, etc. Show me an article where Arum defends Crawford as a better choice for Pac's last fight.

[lefthook2daliva]

Yeah yeah...keep talking Roach.

Both his main guys are about to retire, so he's trying to stay relevant.

[MrRolltide91]

Yea right....

[firstborn]

Manny was told that Bradley is the bigger name and would sell more PPVs and Arum wanted the Bradley fight the entire time... Crawford was just a smoke screen... Crawford is on the cherry-pick trail and would have gotten destroyed by Manny... he'll get exposed as soon as he fights anyone decent at the weight... he's fighting another bum as you know

So you're telling me Arum has the power to influence which opponent Pac selects but Crawford gets to pick an choose who he fights?

[ShoulderRoll]

Manny was told that Bradley is the bigger name and would sell more PPVs and Arum wanted the Bradley fight the entire time... Crawford was just a smoke screen... Crawford is on the cherry-pick trail and would have gotten destroyed by Manny... he'll get exposed as soon as he fights anyone decent at the weight... he's fighting another bum as you know..

Someone had to have pull that out their ass. Bradley and Crawford are both with Arum, makes no difference which one he fights. If he wanted to spite Arum he would have demanded Broner or Khan.

Extremely biased poster who picks and choose what he wants to believe without any attempt at using common sense. So many articles have appeared indicating Arum was justifying why Pacquiao is right in picking Bradley, ie, approved by HBO, cable operators, etc. Show me an article where Arum defends Crawford as a better choice for Pac's last fight.

Ronnie Nathanielsz is the one who made the claim.



The only one on record, who said he thought Bradley won was the unbeaten young Terence Crawford, a Bob Arum fighter, whom the Top Rank Promoter pushed hard for a Pacquiao fight but which, according to Pacman insiders, Manny rejected in order to spite Arum and show who is the boss.

http://www.boxingscene.com/roach-bradley-beat-out-shape-guy-who-ready-retire--100552

[deanrw]

The ones on here calling Crawford a hype job are just as downright silly as the ones who call GGG a hype job.

Simply put, there are guys out there who are the real deal and have the skills. Regardless of what you think, Crawford is the real deal. Postal may be one also. That is why this fight has to happen. Both of them have amazing skillsets that need to be matched up.

Postal himself said recently he was not ready quite yet. Fine then but this fight has to happen in 2016. It is the one fight that I am looking forward to more than any other fight.

[Foreign Soil]

Meh...let then live through their favorite fighters as therapy for their personal insecurities.

The irony of who this post is directed at.. The cliques on this forum are hilarious.

[-PBP-]

The irony of who this post is directed at.. The cliques on this forum are hilarious.

I knew somebody would get butthurt and take my bait

I'm like a pupateer in this mother fuc*ker

[Foreign Soil]

I knew somebody would get butthurt and take my bait

I'm like a pupateer in this mother fuc*ker

Tehehe. Congratulations on being another troll. Like this forum needs any more.

[-PBP-]

Tehehe. Congratulations on being another troll. Like this forum needs any more.

Gotta fight fire with fire