Comments Thread For: Lucas Matthysse Ready For Camp, March/April Return Eyed

[tokon]

War Matthysse! We still here, tall guys like Postol and Crawford are stylistic nightmares for Lucas but there aren't many guys like that at 147. I hope someone thinks they can and tries to **** with Lucas.

They don't need to try to **** with him, they just need to try to beat him and the blueprint how is there already.

I agree that Matthysse needs to go to 147 with Postil and Crawford at 140.

[SalimShady1212]

One can read your message two ways.

"Khan belongs in the ranks of the top 5 fighters" - I would laugh at this and many here would, too.

- Got knocked out by Breidis Prescott
- Got sparked by Danny Garcia
- Got exposed by Chris Algieri
- Ducking Special K Brook
- Ain't been active waiting for a no-chance-in-hell fight against Manny or Floyd


"Khan is nowhere near the Top 5 fighters" - He's no bum. I'd put him in the middle tiers. Anyone that can get past Marcos Maidana without getting hurt deserves that much.

And many wouldn't. Lets not dwell on the past, Brook hasn't been near anyone of note excluding Porter. Someone needs to explain "middle tier" to you. Khan is a world class fighter without a doubt. How can one say Algieri exposed him when he still won. Khan's chin was exposed years ago, being able to outbox him is a different story. We'll see where the top fighters are in 12 months, Keith sometimes will be exposed, Brook may also finally fight someone with a pulse.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Brook hasn't been near anyone of note excluding Porter.

Which makes Khan's blatant avoidance all the more bad. How can you be a top fighter when you refuse to face the one guy everyone in your country wants you to fight, even if it's years after the fact?

It's funny people beat up on Mayweather for "ducking" Hatton - he soundly beats Hatton and people are like "Hatton's washed up doe" - "ducking" Mosley despite Floyd having called him out years ago and getting refused - "ducking" Canelo yet Floyd schooled him - but Khan is supposedly immune to that? Come on.

Someone needs to explain "middle tier" to you. Khan is a world class fighter without a doubt.

He WAS a world class fighter until Danny Garcia, a guy not known for KOs, knocked him out cold. That'd be like Margarito getting sparked by Jessie Vargas. Come on.

How can one say Algieri exposed him when he still won. Khan's chin was exposed years ago, being able to outbox him is a different story.

You can't be serious.

Tarver exposed Roy Jones in the first fight despite losing. That cannot be refuted.

Marquez exposed Pacquiao in the third fight despite losing. Cannot be refuted.

Paulie exposed Broner despite losing. Which is why Broner went on to lose a fight he had no business losing.

Hell, we just saw Soto expose Orozco despite losing.

That crap happens all the time.

Algieri exposed Khan's inability to deal with aggressive pure boxers who aren't afraid of his counters. Khan got that W because the judges would not hand him a loss against a guy fresh off of getting KD'd 6 times by Pacquiao. Had Khan faced Algieri fresh off the Provod fight, we'd have seen a different decision, guaranteed.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Lucas vs Broner.... Make it happen

[SalimShady1212]

Which makes Khan's blatant avoidance all the more bad. How can you be a top fighter when you refuse to face the one guy everyone in your country wants you to fight, even if it's years after the fact?

It's funny people beat up on Mayweather for "ducking" Hatton - he soundly beats Hatton and people are like "Hatton's washed up doe" - "ducking" Mosley despite Floyd having called him out years ago and getting refused - "ducking" Canelo yet Floyd schooled him - but Khan is supposedly immune to that? Come on.



He WAS a world class fighter until Danny Garcia, a guy not known for KOs, knocked him out cold. That'd be like Margarito getting sparked by Jessie Vargas. Come on.



You can't be serious.

Tarver exposed Roy Jones in the first fight despite losing. That cannot be refuted.

Marquez exposed Pacquiao in the third fight despite losing. Cannot be refuted.

Paulie exposed Broner despite losing. Which is why Broner went on to lose a fight he had no business losing.

Hell, we just saw Soto expose Orozco despite losing.

That crap happens all the time.

Algieri exposed Khan's inability to deal with aggressive pure boxers who aren't afraid of his counters. Khan got that W because the judges would not hand him a loss against a guy fresh off of getting KD'd 6 times by Pacquiao. Had Khan faced Algieri fresh off the Provod fight, we'd have seen a different decision, guaranteed.

Khan is not Pacquiao and he CLEARLY beat Algieri, you need to win the majority of the round, not the odd 10 seconds. your agenda is plain as day.

[tokon]

Khan is not Pacquiao and he CLEARLY beat Algieri, you need to win the majority of the round, not the odd 10 seconds. your agenda is plain as day.

So is yours though tbh.

Nothing wrong with "agendas", just be upfront about your own if you are going to accuse others of having them!

[Combat Talk Radio]

Khan is not Pacquiao and he CLEARLY beat Algieri, you need to win the majority of the round, not the odd 10 seconds. your agenda is plain as day.

Compare how Pacquiao beat Algieri to how Khan did it, then come back and tell me that Khan really "won" the fight. There's no way Khan should have been getting hit like he was if he was truly as elite as you peg him to be.

If you tag that performance is "world class", I question your criteria. Because by that logic, you'd have to include Berto, Broner, Brook, Thurman and Peterson - all guilty of turning out the same piss poor performances against lesser opponents.