Comments Thread For: Crawford: Bradley Beat Pacquiao In First Fight, Will Win Third

[juandabomb]

here we go again, beating a dead horse.

[AllEyesOpen]

Crawford nust have seen the fight in slomo.

[Fangedgrowl]

Crawford nust have seen the fight in slomo.

Please Crawford stfu. You just sucking up to another bro. What is with this Crawford, Bradley, Floyd, Ward suck fest. I see it, i know alot of others do too. Crawford how fighting someone with a pulse and outside of damn hickville Omaha before you start flapping them jaws. You had all kinds of trouble with little featherweight cuban. How about fighting Postol, Broner someone to actually earn a shot at a guy like Pacquaio.

[SweetPbfAli]

I'm in the minority that thought it was a draw. Bradley made Manny whiff on A LOT of punches in the second half of the fight on a bum ankle no less and countered effectively, mainly to the body. I still think there's a strong contingent that scores Manny's missed punches because they anticipate they're going to land or are just excited by the speed of the flurry.

[Nomadic]

He truly didn't watch the first fight to believe he won it. He basing the win off of friendship.

[KingTito]

I love Crawford, but Bradley didn't win that fight. I have no problem with him siding with his friend though. I just can't wait to see Bud back in the ring!

[Boxing Goat]

I couldn't find 4 rounds to give Bradley in the first fight to be honest.

I mean, how do you land almost 100 less punches, softer, at a lower percentage and win a decision?

[Xi_]

I couldn't find 4 rounds to give Bradley in the first fight to be honest.

I mean, how do you land almost 100 less punches, softer, at a lower percentage and win a decision?

it can happen if you know how to score fights the way they're suppose to be scored......you score round by round. bradley loss both fights to me but he would have won the second fight if he wasn't such a wannabe warrior/idiot.....bradley has the tools but he's too ******(boxing-wise) to beat pacquiao.

[Boxing Goat]

it can happen if you know how to score fights the way they're suppose to be scored......you score round by round. bradley loss both fights to me but he would have won the second fight if he wasn't such a wannabe warrior/idiot.....bradley has the tools but he's too ******(boxing-wise) to beat pacquiao.

So, Pacquiao didn't just land all those more telling shots in a hand full of rounds. He won almost every one IMO. Also, out of tons of journalists, only a few picked Bradley as the winner.

[Xi_]

So, Pacquiao didn't just land all those more telling shots in a hand full of rounds. He won almost every one IMO. Also, out of tons of journalists, only a few picked Bradley as the winner.

i was speaking in general......i said i had pacquiao winning 8-4/7-5. all i was saying was that it is possible to lose a fight when you out land a guy by over 100 and a higher connection %.