Comments Thread For: CompuBox Pound For Pound List - Breakdown and Review

[-PBP-]

Rigo's +/- is lower than what I'd suspect. He definitely needs to be more active &/or not get hit as much. For his style +7 seems like a ****ty number to me.

His activity is the problem. He gets hit less than everybody on that list but when your only landing 12 per round you not gonna have much of a spread.

Another problem with him is they count his range finding jab as a punch thrown which ****s up his connect percentage. That won't affect his +- but its another reason why he ranks so low.

[Pigeons]

Golovtards when they see the #1 rated fighter.


Golovtards when they see the #2 rated fighter.

[vortex662290]

people it shows numbers not opponents caliber

[Eff Pandas]

His activity is the problem. He gets hit less than everybody on that list but when your only landing 12 per round you not gonna have much of a spread.

Another problem with him is they count his range finding jab as a punch thrown which ****s up his connect percentage. That won't affect his +- but its another reason why he ranks so low.

Awww yea lol I forget to actually look at the rest of the numbers. Just glanced at the +/-. Yea I agree with your take.

[aboutfkntime]

I wonder how many people who decry compubox will turn around and tout this p4p list

> Cotto is ranked lower than Rios

rofl

Yea, I have always said that compubox is rubbish.

Compubox = the crunching of inaccurate numbers.

If you see it for what it is, it's not a problem.

It only falls to pieces when they call it " P4P "

[aboutfkntime]

Still more accurate than Boxrec's P4P list.

Don't be ridiculous

[aboutfkntime]

Lol interesting but really fuq compubox. They can hardly count and now they want to create rankings.

That's the point.

Using hit/miss % to calculate figures is not only flawed methodology, the figures are inaccurate.

I am sure that this will give the casuals some fun and will likely make them even more ******ed.

[_original_]

Will Micheal Buffer include GGG's #1 P4P compubox ranking next time he announces him?

[deanrw]

That's the point.

Using hit/miss % to calculate figures is not only flawed methodology, the figures are inaccurate.

I am sure that this will give the casuals some fun and will likely make them even more ******ed.

Just wait till that poster Golovkin hears this great news. It will be like:

"I hereby decree, that Gennady Golovkin, is not only P4P in printed publications, also the heart and souls of everyone everywhere, but now with today's news, that SCIENCE has now caught up and is backing our claims that GGG is the greatest fighter the universe has ever known!!!"

[A-Wolf]

I wonder how many people who decry compubox will turn around and tout this p4p list

> Cotto is ranked lower than Rios

rofl

What is the meaning of that exactly?

Is that some sort of reverse ad hominem kind of thing?