Comments Thread For: Andre Ward-Sullivan Barrera Being Finalized For March 26
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
ggg turned pro later then most and ggg is from kazakhstan so it was very difficult to build a following where ward was fighting on US tv early on in his career. you don't seem to be factoring in these things. you seem to be pretending that everything is equal for every fighter which it clearly is not. its like giving trump 100 million dollars and giving another guy 5 dollars. look trump is more successful after 10 years....a shocking result. ward used his opportunities to become very successful but he also squandered many opportunities by being inactive and turning down fights. meanwhile ggg has continued to rise slowly but surely while ignoring people who continually compare him to American fighters who had inherent advantages. you can't cater to the ignorant...unless you are trump. brought it all around in the endComment
-
It's his first fight at the weight. Going into a probable Kovalev fight. Yea... let's ignore that. This is a pretty damn good fight at lhw all things considered. There aren't many other fights that can be made that would be better. I'm not sure what your point is tbh.Comment
-
Andre Ward acts like Ward is doing fans and boxing a huge favor just by fighting anyone. Ward actually thinks boxing needs Andre Ward in Oakland. Ward could be dumber than james Kirkland and that is DUMB>"Ward has overvalued his importance in boxing."
That, right there, is absolutely spot on the money. The guy is a bit delusional, or a lot delusional. Premature talk of P4P went to his head, and he believed his own hype. He's a decent, if boring, operator, who maybe could have been so much more - the Froch rematch in UK, for example, would have solidified his reputation AND put millions in his bank account.
Many avid boxing followers now have a dislike for the guy because he has done nothing of note for years and years. I'm glad he's taking on a semi respectable opponent (if it actually happens), but supporters of his would have us believe he's doing boxing some massive favour by taking on a minor risk.
If he wins = good, we get to see Kovalev dismantle him. If he loses that's ok too, he can fight more bums in Oakland bingo halls. Not good for boxing, him and his attitude.Comment
-
but last year you were saying how johnson was a good fight. I swear you cant go a day on here without talking out your ass
I like how people use ring as the standard.. but the next day say how ring sucks. Barerra is top 10 in wbc and wbaComment
-
Comment
-
Not his first fight at the weight. I see what you mean but he should be put on higher standards considering you guys are putting his ok resume on a pedestal.It's his first fight at the weight. Going into a probable Kovalev fight. Yea... let's ignore that. This is a pretty damn good fight at lhw all things considered. There aren't many other fights that can be made that would be better. I'm not sure what your point is tbh.
There's plenty of better fighters in the division. I can name you 10 based on ratings. If you're the so called best in the world, you have to back it up. Fighting a non top 10 guy doesn't cut it.Comment
-
I'm not even sure what their point is...lhw is a pretty crap division, probably even worse than mw but fir the fact that it's actually top heavy. All the guys under the top 5 on rings rankings are journeymen and prospects and new contenders. In the top 4 we have Kovalev, Stevenson, Hopkins, and Pascal...all of those guys are either unavailable or retired. Finally we have Alvarez rounding out the top 5 whose fighting chilemba. So that means there are a total of 6 fighters who are completely unavailable in the top 10. The other 4? Guys who are no better than Barrera tbh.Comment
Comment