amir khan wont fight brook 'cause no respect?
Collapse
-
I picked Khan to beat both Alexander and I can remember about Collazo to be honest.
I may have commented Collazo could give him some problems as it was his first fight at 147...got that wrong!
Its irrelevant anyway, both are busted flushes and beating them proves absolutely nothing.
Before Khan fought Collazo you stated Collazo was a legitimate Test... Now you claim he is a busted flush, and Khan has not fought anyone creible at 147.
So if Khan beats Brook then he will also be labelled a bum? and Khan will still not have fought anyone credible?
Here is your prediction for Khan vs Collazo.
A genuine test for Khan.
He needs to win convincingly to have any sort of shot a suckling on Floyd's golden teat.
Personally in terms of achievement and ability I think that Khan and Collazo are on a pretty even level, Collazo just never gets the ridiculous hype that Khan does.
Part of me wants Khan to fail, he just keeps spouting the same BS and it get tiring.
Collazo, on the other hand remains humble and focused - he is my pick.Last edited by Invictas; 01-04-2016, 10:56 AM.Comment
-
I dont recall Hatton getting "applauded" for ducking Witter. You can't face the #1 and #2 pfp fighters in the sport in their primes then get criticized for not fighting Witter.Comment
-
I remember this hahaha
Khan thinks he is on Mayweather and Pacquiao level, no seriously he really does think he is a World Wide Superstar and as big of a draw as Mayweather and Pacquiao
Didn't he say something like he can help Mayweather become a bigger World Wide Star lolLast edited by sicko; 01-04-2016, 01:10 PM.Comment
-
For the record I picked both Alexander and Collazo to beat Khan.. But I am not gonna change my tune now and call them bums.
Before Khan fought Collazo you stated Collazo was a legitimate Test... Now you claim he is a busted flush, and Khan has not fought anyone creible at 147.
So if Khan beats Brook then he will also be labelled a bum? and Khan will still not have fought anyone credible?
Here is your prediction for Khan vs Collazo.
I don't think Khan is a bum, but I do believe he is nowhere near as good as he believes he is.
Don't worry about trolling me, just look at Khans record since Garcia.
It speaks for itself.
No hard hitters, blown up lightweight and light WWs or fighters well past prime.
If Khan fought Thurman, Bradley, Porter or even Guerrero I'd give him props.
But he won't, and there is a reason for that.
He won't risk getting KOd again because he knows his career would be over.Comment
-
As I stated, whatever my prediction was I got it wrong regarding Collazo.
I don't think Khan is a bum, but I do believe he is nowhere near as good as he believes he is.
Don't worry about trolling me, just look at Khans record since Garcia.
It speaks for itself.
No hard hitters, blown up lightweight and light WWs or fighters well past prime.
If Khan fought Thurman, Bradley, Porter or even Guerrero I'd give him props.
But he won't, and there is a reason for that.
He won't risk getting KOd again because he knows his career would be over.
Both those fights were seen as legitimate challenges soon as Khan won, the same people who where picking Alexander and Collazo started labelling them bums.
If Khan were to fight , Thurman, Bradley, Porter, Gurerrero, Peterson, Garcia, Brook etc. Those same fighters would also be labelled bums by these same fans I find that quite bizarre.
The fact is if one picks against a fighter and he wins, then atleast be consistent and give credit when its due.
Similarly the same people saying Khan is irrelevant are posting Thread after Thread and Comment after Comment concerning Khan.
Khan probably gets more threads and comments then all the aforementioned fighters combined...Even more strange.Last edited by Invictas; 01-04-2016, 03:29 PM.Comment
-
I have looked at Khans record 57% of this forum picked Alexander in the pre-fight poll.... 48% including yourself picked Collazo.
Both those fights were seen as legitimate challenges soon as Khan won, the same people who where picking Alexander and Collazo started labelling them bums.
If Khan were to fight , Thurman, Bradley, Porter, Gurerrero, Peterson, Garcia, Brook etc. Those same fighters would also be labelled bums by these same fans I find that quite bizarre.
The fact is if one picks against a fighter and he wins, then atleast be consistent and give credit when its due.
Similarly the same people saying Khan is irrelevant are posting Thread after Thread and Comment after Comment concerning Khan.
Khan probably gets more threads and comments then all the aforementioned fighters combined...Even more strange.
You are starting to sound like Box Office...Comment
-
That does not mean I cannot be objective nor am I going to just criticise because its cool on this forum to criticise certain fighters , as far as Khan goes, he is seriously flawed fighter who has probably over achieved and is coming towards the end of his career.
I think you understood the point quite clearly I made a valid point you picked Collazo and stated it was a genuine test...., for some reason you seem hopelessly obsessed with Khan . It looks like you are unable to take justified criticism about your approach, blind obsession and double standards.Comment
-
Well if you read my posts you would know I am a Kell Brook Fan, and unlike others have been so since Kell was fighting the likes of Karl Taylor, and Ernie Smith.
That does not mean I cannot be objective nor am I going to just criticise because its cool on this forum to criticise certain fighters , as far as Khan goes, he is seriously flawed fighter who has probably over achieved and is coming towards the end of his career.
I think you understood the point quite clearly I made a valid point you picked Collazo and stated it was a genuine test...., for some reason you seem hopelessly obsessed with Khan . It looks like you are unable to take justified criticism about your approach, blind obsession and double standards.
Move on.Comment
Comment