If GGG was at 147, would he still be ducked?

[Lester Tutor]

Umm what?

1. Is it bad to unify titles now all of a sudden?

2. He will fight anyone regardless of who the promoter is. Wanted Martinez he was with Dibella, Sturm, Lemieux, now BJS..all with different promotions.

3. Paper? Anytime you win a title, you're a champion. I guess Canelo is a paper champion as well because we know he is not as good as GGG at 160?

Jacobs is only a champion because the WBA is a ridiculous organization that has 3 title holders in every division. He's a paper champion in your words. $2 million is not ridiculous but 3-5 is absolutely out of the realm of possibility considering Jacobs-Quillen did terrible numbers and sold only 8500 tickets in their home city.

Jacobs don't want any part of GGG anyhow. He can just hang out on his side of the street and be happy...I like DJ but he's just another guy for GGG to beat.

you're weird dude. you criticize the WBA yet somehow you try to defend Golovkin's status with it. I can I agree with you 2 million sounds about right. I saw from 2-3. However, my point is GGG doesn't even need the WBA since he has the Super. Try and read what I wrote.

Bad unifying titles? Where do I even insinuate that from my post? I'm criticizing you to make a point that Jacobs is a way more justified contender than Lemieux. However way you want to spin that good luck.

If you want a clear example, or IDEAL example, look at the Fury vs Klitschko bout. Were they fighting for anything vacant!? That's referring to your ''paper'' observation..

[STREET CLEANER]

I literally just picked the ******est topic/question I could think of and posted it for a laugh. 9 replies in 20 mins? fcuk this forum

I saw this and my first question is who the **** is ducking him?

[Jsmooth9876]

you're weird dude. you criticize the WBA yet somehow you try to defend Golovkin's status with it. I can I agree with you 2 million sounds about right. I saw from 2-3. However, my point is GGG doesn't even need the WBA since he has the Super. Try and read what I wrote.

Bad unifying titles? Where do I even insinuate that from my post? I'm criticizing you to make a point that Jacobs is a way more justified contender than Lemieux. However way you want to spin that good luck.

If you want a clear example, or IDEAL example, look at the Fury vs Klitschko bout. Were they fighting for anything vacant!? That's referring to your ''paper'' observation..

GGG is the champion...Jacobs has the paper title. Sure Jacobs is a contender and good opponent but how is or was he any more qualified then Lemieux who held a title? Was it his big win over Sergio Mora?

I'm criticizing because without their ****** 3 belts in each divison GGG would be their only champion and Jacobs would just be a mandatory for Golovkin.

[jqSide]

He's not being ducked. The minute his team starts paying his opponents top dollar people will be beating down his door.

That's essentially being ducked. GG paying "top dollar" to attract ducks when he himself is not even paid top dollar is beyond silly.

Lara got his first $ million when he fought Rodriguez. GG got his in the Lemieux fight, and on PPV, mind you. Guess how much would Lara want if he's asked to fight GG.

[KLockard23]

If he still had the same knockout power and about the same ratio of KO victories, then likely yes.

[about.thousands]

Now ya'll making up hypothetical situations to prove the welterweights are ducking GGG? GGG fans a nucking futs