Tweet
This is getting pretty sad
-
-
All the FIomos and/or Pac-haters who said ******ed things like "Bradley really won the first fight" or "Bradley was winning the second fight until..."
You idiots are the reason this fight is happening...
Pac won the first fight 10-2..and the second 9-3..if you have any closer scorecard for Bradley you're borderline ******ed...
I have no interest in this fight... wow this might be the first year I don't order a Boxing PPV unless Triple G vs. Canelo gets made in Sept...there are no fights PPV worthy or even close...
Pacquiao is picking up a $20 mil paycheck fighting a washed-up light-hitter he easily beat twice already and Arum gets an in-house fight.. while 400K morons will order this fight..
Going to start watching UFC at this rate...
Boxing is becoming a sport where runners and huggers win rounds doing nothing and big stars fight other names just because of name recognition when the fights are clearly not desired by hardcore fans..Last edited by MisanthropicNY; 12-30-2015, 07:20 PM.Comment
-
Agreed....zero interest in seeing this. Dont even care who wins. Just doesnt matter at allComment
-
IDK about Pac-Bradley III, only posting to respond to Diaz's quote
"All that he was doing differently was moving side to side."
Ok, all due respect to Diaz, but I thought the lateral movement (on the inside) was part of the reason why got a stoppage (outside of Rios being a shell of himself) - it seemed like he was able to get a different kind of leverage and placement on his body shots. AT one point, he threw a right hook to the body right to the head combos for ffs- I'm not really a Bradley fan, but I've seen a lot of his fights from shobox till now and I don't recall seeing him throw that succession of shots in such good form. Thought that was a nice additionLast edited by LA_2_Vegas; 12-30-2015, 07:26 PM.Comment
-
Funny how Pacquiao, Arum and others were talking about the fist fight being the biggest robbery in boxing history, how Manny easily won the first fight...obviously the second fight..Pac won rounds 7-12 after splitting the first 3...so how does Pac or Arum justify a "triology aka rubber match"?
Pacquiao's legacy really takes a hit in the same way that Floyd's does..this fight is obviously no where near as bad as picking Berto... but it's pretty close..
Pac is obviously looking for a light-punching safe choice to exit with $20 mil...
As far as I'm concerned..just as I treated Mayweather... Pacquiao is retired from boxing..and I'll turn my attention on the rest of boxing...
It was a good career Pac..and I'm glad you can make $20 mil because of haters who hated you so much they tried to pretend the Bradley fights were competitive...Comment
-
He's really bitter, in'he?Comment
-
He's Right
No one wants to see this fight a 3rd time. The first 2 were blow outs. Pac got absolutely robbed in the first fight. Combined Tim Bradley has not won more than 8 rounds total.
Pac probably won't KO him. But it will probably be another land slide. Damn shame that Terence Crawford didn't get this opportunity in my opinion.
Also Joel Diaz stop talking about Bradley. You guys are done. Move on like Tim did. You have plenty of young talent to prepare to become Champions. Move OnComment
-
Good old bitter Diaz, still talking smack as usual. I bet you that if he were still training Bradley, he'd be all about the fight, saying that Bradley would win for sure this time and that the fight is really needed to settle this once and for all. But since he isn't.........yeah....Comment
Comment