Comments Thread For: Pacquiao vs. Bradley III Set, April 9 At MGM Grand

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Xi_
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 3957
    • 193
    • 6
    • 13,179

    #81
    Originally posted by MrRolltide91
    Expect a controversial decision
    whoever gets screwed deserves it just off the strength of being dumb enough to re-sign with TR.

    Comment

    • StrangerInTown
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2007
      • 1316
      • 96
      • 5
      • 9,787

      #82
      On paper, a very safe conclusion to an excellent career.
      The Atlas factor will be promoted to hype this retread. The PPV numbers will be shallow for an alleged farewell.

      Comment

      • MrRolltide91
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Aug 2010
        • 12208
        • 167
        • 1
        • 30,631

        #83

        Comment

        • Kris Silver
          Kneel 4 Silver,good boy!
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 7795
          • 1,070
          • 3,576
          • 27,245

          #84
          Add up all the rematches and they've really padded and been a detriment to his CV overall. It's used up years when he could've got some other names like Khan, Brook, Garcia, Broner.

          You have a trilogy if it's 1 all. And it's not in reality really - is it.

          Comment

          • Robbie Barrett
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2013
            • 40891
            • 2,779
            • 667
            • 570,921

            #85
            Pacquiao gets robbed and we get Pacquiao-Bradley 4.

            Comment

            • Mr. Philadel
              #215Boxing
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 20893
              • 1,071
              • 1,413
              • 35,332

              #86
              damn....TR doesn't have a deep enough roster at 140-147....that'll be seven fights against Bradley and Marquez combined....smh....Top Recycle does it again...what's next?!? Rios-Alvarado 4?!?...Bradley-Rios 2?!?...I mean like WTF?!?...smh

              Comment

              • crisantonio917
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2015
                • 1291
                • 329
                • 51
                • 12,993

                #87
                As Bad As Mayweather-Berto

                Wouldn't pay a dime to see this crap, the first and second fight ******!

                Comment

                • Weltschmerz
                  Sehnsucht
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 16546
                  • 698
                  • 1,622
                  • 27,699

                  #88
                  Makes sense, makes sense.

                  Comment

                  • -PBP-
                    32 Time World Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 24107
                    • 836
                    • 635
                    • 34,297

                    #89
                    Originally posted by MrRolltide91

                    I figured that was the case. There isn't enough buzz for Pacquiao vs. TC at the moment.

                    Comment

                    • Mr. Philadel
                      #215Boxing
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 20893
                      • 1,071
                      • 1,413
                      • 35,332

                      #90
                      Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
                      Pacquiao gets robbed and we get Pacquiao-Bradley 4.
                      you already know....Top Recycle knows how to sell the same product, over and over and over again

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP