here is a link but the peyton manning hgh fiasco also names mike tyson. Not good but its starting to become quiet clear that pretty much every top athlete uses it. http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14...letes-use-peds
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tyson named in the hgh fiasco
Collapse
-
If you read the article the guy says he made most of the top names up (Like Manning) :/
I dont think anyone would care if Tyson was recently on hgh. Dude hasn't fought in ages
Comment
-
I'll be glad when all this salem witch trials **** is over with with PEDs. What bs world do we live in where there are things out there that allow for athletes to perform better & recovery faster & some fans are all like "nah can't have that...I want my athletes operating at 95% & to be on IR for half the season".
I think people in the future will wonder why we demonized advancements in science that allow for better athletes. And I guess my main problem is some enhancements is okay while other enhancements aren't. Like you can get new f#cking body parts & that **** is cool. Guys are blowing out there ACL's & getting dead guy ACL's & thats cool. You should get one ACL. If you blow it out your career is over or you better tape that mfer up good & learn to do some sort of high level limping. And if you got ****ty eye sight you shouldn't be able to wear glasses or contacts. Thats cheating. You got ****ty eyes deal with it Mr. Magoo. Get lasik surgery & get banned. Thats the **** I have a problem with. There is some false belief there isn't enhancements going on already & that some are okay & others aren't. Either enhancing your body to perform better is cool or it isn't.
Randomly I heard Mark Cuban is investing in a HGH study to see how viable its usage would be in recovery for athletes. I think he's of the opinion it would be better if certain things were allowable or at least HGH is worth looking into as a means to use in pro sports so thats a step in the right direction.Last edited by Eff Pandas; 12-27-2015, 06:03 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NearHypnos View PostIf you read the article the guy says he made most of the top names up (Like Manning) :/
I dont think anyone would care if Tyson was recently on hgh. Dude hasn't fought in ages
Peyton gonna Omaha his ass
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostI'll be glad when all this salem witch trials **** is over with with PEDs. What bs world do we live in where there are things out there that allow for athletes to perform better & recovery faster & some fans are all like "nah can't have that...I want my athletes operating at 95% & to be on IR for half the season".
I think people in the future will wonder why we demonized advancements in science that allow for better athletes. And I guess my main problem is some enhancements is okay while other enhancements aren't. Like you can get new f#cking body parts & that **** is cool. Guys are blowing out there ACL's & getting dead guy ACL's & thats cool. You should get one ACL. If you blow it out your career is over or you better tape that mfer up good & learn to do some sort of high level limping. And if you got ****ty eye sight you shouldn't be able to wear glasses or contacts. Thats cheating. You got ****ty eyes deal with it Mr. Magoo. Get lasik surgery & get banned. Thats the **** I have a problem with. There is some false belief there isn't enhancements going on already & that some are okay & others aren't. Either enhancing your body to perform better is cool or it isn't.
Randomly I heard Mark Cuban is investing in a HGH study to see how viable its usage would be in recovery for athletes. I think he's of the opinion it would be better if certain things were allowable or at least HGH is worth looking into as a means to use in pro sports so thats a step in the right direction.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostI'll be glad when all this salem witch trials **** is over with with PEDs. What bs world do we live in where there are things out there that allow for athletes to perform better & recovery faster & some fans are all like "nah can't have that...I want my athletes operating at 95% & to be on IR for half the season".
I think people in the future will wonder why we demonized advancements in science that allow for better athletes. And I guess my main problem is some enhancements is okay while other enhancements aren't. Like you can get new f#cking body parts & that **** is cool. Guys are blowing out there ACL's & getting dead guy ACL's & thats cool. You should get one ACL. If you blow it out your career is over or you better tape that mfer up good & learn to do some sort of high level limping. And if you got ****ty eye sight you shouldn't be able to wear glasses or contacts. Thats cheating. You got ****ty eyes deal with it Mr. Magoo. Get lasik surgery & get banned. Thats the **** I have a problem with. There is some false belief there isn't enhancements going on already & that some are okay & others aren't. Either enhancing your body to perform better is cool or it isn't.
Randomly I heard Mark Cuban is investing in a HGH study to see how viable its usage would be in recovery for athletes. I think he's of the opinion it would be better if certain things were allowable or at least HGH is worth looking into as a means to use in pro sports so thats a step in the right direction.
I don't buy your logic entirely, but I agree with you for the most part.
I don't follow body building, but I've heard that there are two competitions:
1) all natural & 2) whatever it's called, but it clearly OK's PED usage
I see nothing wrong with that.
Who gives a **** if grown men want to take PEDs while competing against other grown men who are taking PEDs. If the fans want to watch super human performances--then so be it.
It's when one guy hires a chemist who masks the PEDs presence, and then concussively KOs another non-PED guy, that's where the problem arises.
Watching Nolan Ryan pitch against Roger Clemens becomes way less compelling when you learn that one has an unfair advantage.
Finally, Cuban is a ruthless CEO. He'll invest in whatever makes money. The fact that he's "looking to invest" in something says nothing about its ethics or viability in athletic competition.Last edited by nveleven; 12-27-2015, 09:27 AM.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostI'll be glad when all this salem witch trials **** is over with with PEDs. What bs world do we live in where there are things out there that allow for athletes to perform better & recovery faster & some fans are all like "nah can't have that...I want my athletes operating at 95% & to be on IR for half the season".
I think people in the future will wonder why we demonized advancements in science that allow for better athletes. And I guess my main problem is some enhancements is okay while other enhancements aren't. Like you can get new f#cking body parts & that **** is cool. Guys are blowing out there ACL's & getting dead guy ACL's & thats cool. You should get one ACL. If you blow it out your career is over or you better tape that mfer up good & learn to do some sort of high level limping. And if you got ****ty eye sight you shouldn't be able to wear glasses or contacts. Thats cheating. You got ****ty eyes deal with it Mr. Magoo. Get lasik surgery & get banned. Thats the **** I have a problem with. There is some false belief there isn't enhancements going on already & that some are okay & others aren't. Either enhancing your body to perform better is cool or it isn't.
Randomly I heard Mark Cuban is investing in a HGH study to see how viable its usage would be in recovery for athletes. I think he's of the opinion it would be better if certain things were allowable or at least HGH is worth looking into as a means to use in pro sports so thats a step in the right direction.Last edited by nacho daddy; 12-27-2015, 11:36 AM.
Comment
Comment