Comments Thread For: Source Says Crolla Will Face Linares Instead of Barroso

[Chrismart]

I had a feeling Hearn wouldn't fancy facing Barroso next with Crolla.

[tiliheels]

Mandatory probably ordered in Jan last I saw. It probably is, but I don't feel like looking it up again

wbc said they started free negotiates nov 4..someone in a boxrec form says it was ordered nov. 22nd...wbc needs to get busy..its a great fight and that division could easily be unified if linares loses

[tiliheels]

I had a feeling Hearn wouldn't fancy facing Barroso next with Crolla.

crolla rounds out the bottom barrell of champs in boxing alongside smith at jr mw..i could see this division being unified no doubt

[Corelone]

I had a feeling Hearn wouldn't fancy facing Barroso next with Crolla.

And he's just name dropping. Low bid time and Linares is priced out.

[Corelone]

crolla rounds out the bottom barrell of champs in boxing alongside smith at jr mw..i could see this division being unified no doubt

Lots of room with 85 titles at hand. Better to have 5 champs each paying full sanction fee than a unified champ paying a fraction of a fee.

[285Kid]

Would Barasso even be his mando? Matthews talked about how him being the interim meant nothing about being the mando.

Either way, if Crolla does have a mando with him, Linares got one with Darjan

But you can skip a mandatory fight only if its a unification fight

[tiliheels]

Lots of room with 85 titles at hand. Better to have 5 champs each paying full sanction fee than a unified champ paying a fraction of a fee.

im not worried about the money part it would sort itself out and exposes the fakes in boxing who try to steal their belt back bc they cant have a full sanctioning fee...truth is belts should mean nothing in boxing..and i stick to that..they have never thrown a punch..does ufc pay a fee to be champ?