Comments Thread For: Broner on Facing Pacquiao: I Love Fighting Southpaws!
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Floyd had just beaten the one guy that everyone said he was afraid of. The one guy that everyone thought was going to give him his toughest battle ever.Dont play dumb. Broner is far better than Berto and any poll would show that Broner is far more acceptable as a final opponent for Pac than Berto was for Mayweather. Nothing you say can spin that any other way. So stripping away your obvious bias, you called Mayweather a pu$$y.
After getting that win it didn't matter who Floyd took a victory lap against, it was going to be anticlimactic anyway.
Pacquiao is not in the same position. Not at all.Comment
-
heavy hitting? come on manThese same Broner haters swore former heavy hitting southpaw champ Khabib was going to KO Broner....instead it was one of Broner's best performances since DeMarco. Broner's countering speed is twice that of Pacs. Broner might actually end up schooling Pac! Bring on Broner vs Bradley afterwards!!
Comment
-
Broner has the knowledge to give Pacquiao problems but I doubt he can execute the plan, he would just freeze up like vs Porter and get tagged and spinned all night. Unanimous win for Pac.
I would still be interested, let's not act like we all wouldn't watch it
Comment
-
Comment
-
Disagree completely. Maidana did very well against Mayweather compared with the expectations and compared to other fighters.Not very interested in this fight, But i understand Pac's team for the interest. Pacquiao will claim his success against Broner compared to Mayweather was because he was 100%, sadly Maidana has proven success against AB does not translate to the same against Mayweather.
Also this is all or nothing for Pac cause if he loses it kills any interest there may have been for May/Pac II.Comment
-
Both Floyd and Pac were proven greats long before they fought each other. Pac has nothing to prove by beating Broner, Bradley, Crawford or whoever else. The only win that would have added anything significant to his legacy would have been Floyd, and now that he has lost that fight it isn't particularly important imo who he fights next. Of course as a boxing fan I want it to be a good fight against a good fighter, but he doesn't owe any of us ****.Floyd had just beaten the one guy that everyone said he was afraid of. The one guy that everyone thought was going to give him his toughest battle ever.
After getting that win it didn't matter who Floyd took a victory lap against, it was going to be anticlimactic anyway.
Pacquiao is not in the same position. Not at all.Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 12-21-2015, 04:15 PM.Comment
-
He still could of fought some young up and coming fighter like every other great fighter in the past has done. The fact he went out with berto (even though most likely he'll come back) says a lot about froid. The fact your calling pacquiao a ***** for not fighting Crawford (which I hope he does) is just showing your bias and deep throating for froidFloyd had just beaten the one guy that everyone said he was afraid of. The one guy that everyone thought was going to give him his toughest battle ever.
After getting that win it didn't matter who Floyd took a victory lap against, it was going to be anticlimactic anyway.
Pacquiao is not in the same position. Not at all.Comment
I say Broner by UD.
Comment