I believe it was "USA TODAY" who dropped the news, but who was their "source" exactly? Do we have a name or how they know that info?
USA TODAY isn't exactly the go-to for sports news, let alone boxing related stuff so I'm a little skeptical.
Crawford is by far the best choice for Pac, especially since Pac wants his final fight to take place at another catchweight, I believe 144 lb was thrown around. Since Crawford is the one being forced up, it's a good choice for both parties.
Plus Crawford is coming off a nice win and looked real solid in there, or "mean" as Kellerman put it. The biggest plus is that he's with Top Rank, so of course that's a plus for Bob who wants things in-house.
Why would they pass on Crawford in the first place? To fight another boring THIRD fight with Bradley? Doubtful.
USA TODAY isn't exactly the go-to for sports news, let alone boxing related stuff so I'm a little skeptical.
Crawford is by far the best choice for Pac, especially since Pac wants his final fight to take place at another catchweight, I believe 144 lb was thrown around. Since Crawford is the one being forced up, it's a good choice for both parties.
Plus Crawford is coming off a nice win and looked real solid in there, or "mean" as Kellerman put it. The biggest plus is that he's with Top Rank, so of course that's a plus for Bob who wants things in-house.
Why would they pass on Crawford in the first place? To fight another boring THIRD fight with Bradley? Doubtful.
Comment