Story about Canelo abandoning catchweight is false

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OnePunch
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 9122
    • 1,307
    • 776
    • 2,453,131

    #11
    Originally posted by about.thousands
    The sweet science based their story from CBSSPORTS.COM who said Eric Gomez confirmed no catchweight



    http://mweb.cbssports.com/general/ey...m-bouts-before

    and Im telling you that story is complete horse****.

    Believe what you want. And when the catchweight talks resurface in May you can claim amnesia.

    And dont be surprised if that cbs story magically disappears (or at least gets edited) in the next day or so.....
    Last edited by OnePunch; 12-17-2015, 10:34 AM.

    Comment

    • OnePunch
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 9122
      • 1,307
      • 776
      • 2,453,131

      #12
      Originally posted by !WAR CANELO!
      pssh only persons on this site who were in the mix like that were earnie adn some poster name F***
      so then lets make some sort of wager, big mouth. Put up or shut up.

      Im saying the catchweight issue is NOT dead, and will resurface later in the negotiations.

      I trust my sources enough to make a wager. Are you game, or do you just like to run your mouth?

      Comment

      • about.thousands
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2015
        • 3821
        • 163
        • 185
        • 4,514

        #13
        Originally posted by OnePunch
        and Im telling you that story is complete horse****.

        Believe what you want. And when the catchweight talks resurface in May you can claim amnesia.

        And dont be surprised if that cbs story magically disappears in the next day or so.....
        Puigmire reported that Gomez told him the same thing. And where is Oscar? Gomez has been speaking for the company every since those pictures of Oscar at the McGregor after party came out. You would think he would've made a statement about the fight by now. It'll be interesting to see if he's at the weigh in tomorrow

        Comment

        • .!WAR MIKEY!.
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Aug 2015
          • 23780
          • 889
          • 769
          • 309,182

          #14
          Originally posted by OnePunch
          so then lets make some sort of wager, big mouth. Put up or shut up.

          Im saying the catchweight issue is NOT dead, and will resurface later in the negotiations.

          I trust my sources enough to make a wager. Are you game, or do you just like to run your mouth?
          that not saying nothing at all all of us can say that lol hell even I will tell you canelo aint dumping that catchweigth shit lol.

          let me put it this way.

          My sources told me (private conversation I dont share sources) said the Catchweight issue is still an issue.

          Comment

          • OnePunch
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2008
            • 9122
            • 1,307
            • 776
            • 2,453,131

            #15
            Originally posted by about.thousands
            Puigmire reported that Gomez told him the same thing. And where is Oscar? Gomez has been speaking for the company every since those pictures of Oscar at the McGregor after party came out. You would think he would've made a statement about the fight by now. It'll be interesting to see if he's at the weigh in tomorrow
            pugmire only cited the cbs story. This whoe story boils down to some cbs writed named Frank that nobody knows of. Yeah, a story this big, and Frank the nobody is the one who breaks it? GTFOH

            Dude, step back and think for a second. Why would Canelo give up for FREE his biggest negotiating item? Makes no sense. I knew it made no sense yesterday when I read it. Thats why I was cautiously optimistic and prefaced all my posts with "if this is true" type statements. And it wasnt until last night that I could confirm it was all bull****.

            Comment

            • bigjavi973
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2013
              • 24007
              • 759
              • 1,480
              • 1,236,071

              #16
              Originally posted by OnePunch
              private conversations that I dont disclose. Its a free country my friend, you can believe it or not.

              But in May when catchweight talks suddenly restart, your apology will still be accepted :-)
              What is there to apologize??? All I did was ask a simple question. I, for one, think that Canelo will CW GGG.

              Question is will Team GGG stick to their guns about no catchweight for being mando.....

              Comment

              • OnePunch
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2008
                • 9122
                • 1,307
                • 776
                • 2,453,131

                #17
                Originally posted by !WAR CANELO!
                that not saying nothing at all all of us can say that lol hell even I will tell you canelo aint dumping that catchweigth shit lol.

                let me put it this way.

                My sources told me (private conversation I dont share sources) said the Catchweight issue is still an issue.
                so then we agree the story is bull****.

                So whats your problem then?

                Comment

                • bigjavi973
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2013
                  • 24007
                  • 759
                  • 1,480
                  • 1,236,071

                  #18
                  Originally posted by about.thousands
                  The sweet science based their story from CBSSPORTS.COM who said Eric Gomez confirmed no catchweight



                  http://mweb.cbssports.com/general/ey...m-bouts-before
                  I always thought it was funny... people blame cotto for mw being the way it is.... but forget that martinez defended that same belt at 158 lbs.... no one complained... Martinez has never weighed more than 159.5 lbs.... so I have no issue with the cotto-martinez cw fight.

                  Comment

                  • .!WAR MIKEY!.
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Aug 2015
                    • 23780
                    • 889
                    • 769
                    • 309,182

                    #19
                    Originally posted by OnePunch
                    so then we agree the story is bull****.

                    So whats your problem then?
                    that story aint fake, they got info just like you did.

                    now only time will tell if they were right or not.

                    Comment

                    • OnePunch
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2008
                      • 9122
                      • 1,307
                      • 776
                      • 2,453,131

                      #20
                      Originally posted by bigjavi973
                      What is there to apologize??? All I did was ask a simple question. I, for one, think that Canelo will CW GGG.

                      Question is will Team GGG stick to their guns about no catchweight for being mando.....
                      imo, no they wont. They want the fight and the lineal title. If they were going to stay firm at 160, I think they would already have moved for a purse bid.

                      I suspect (my own opinion) that they would agree to anything 157 or above. Again, thats just my opinion and isnt coming from either camp.....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP