Let’s say Golovkin and Canelo are going to win their next fight and clash in September for the undisputed 160 lbs crown. How would you rate the fight historically? In my opinion it would be the biggest middleweight title fight since Hopkins vs. Trinidad.
How would you rate GGG vs. Canelo historically?
Collapse
-
How would you rate GGG vs. Canelo historically?
30Biggest middleweight fight since Hopkins vs. Trinidad.36.67%11Even bigger than Hopkins vs. Trinidad.36.67%11Top 5 past 15 years.13.33%4I don't care.13.33%4Tags: None -
Comment
-
The people love Golovkin. It would do much better. 150k wasn't bad considering Lemieux had only one fight on HBO before and the countdown show was poor. You need a dance partner to pull great numbers and Golovkin is the perfect B-side for Canelo. He's an undefeated, charismatic knockout artist and the 24/7 will bomb. Imagine Golovkin taking the HBO team to the mean streets of Karaganda Kazachstan talking about his childhood. People will love it. Furthermore, he's a thread to Canelo. Actually, Canelo would be the underdog. Every Mexican and his dog would buy the fight and a lot of casuals.
OnePunch
I was thinking about BHop vs. De la Hoya as well, but let's be honest: Oscar looked terrible against Sturm and he was never a middleweight in the first place. He looked very small against Hopkins. On the other side Trinidad was still undefeated and looked like a beast against Joppy.Comment
-
I vote for the biggest since BHop and Trinidad, in this case Canelo is the one bringing the real hype to the fight.
Financially I think it will do good numbersComment

Comment