nothing memorable happened in the fight. if pacquiao didnt dominate the round, judges just assumed the round was floyd even if he didnt do crap either.
neither fighter did anything significant to the other.
i mean if you're a floyd fan, sure, you're happy about the win, but in essence, floyd didnt do anything.
It seemed like the onus was on pacquiao to either dominate the round, and if he didnt dominate, the round was automatically given to floyd despite the fact that floyd didnt do much either.

this was a fight?
neither fighter did anything significant to the other.
i mean if you're a floyd fan, sure, you're happy about the win, but in essence, floyd didnt do anything.
It seemed like the onus was on pacquiao to either dominate the round, and if he didnt dominate, the round was automatically given to floyd despite the fact that floyd didnt do much either.

this was a fight?
Comment