Who is the worst Belt holder?
Collapse
-
-
agree about Ramirez although I like ovil he has no business winning a world title and if that fight was in the uk he would have won. Crolla's a bit better but still loses to: Mitchell, Burns, Flanagan, Derry and CampbellComment
-
Depends on what you mean by worst
If you mean deserving, well Floyd is still WBA welterweight champion despite being officially retired. Wilder beat Stiverne who beat Arreola. How that lineage of fights counts as world championship level is laughable. Quigg is only a recognised champion now because Rigo was stripped.
If you mean by worst boxer, i'd probably argue Kono. His current reign started from a vacant title. The recent bout between him and Kameda was a set up for Kameda to become a 4 weight world champion, in the same light as Broner, but Kameda ****ed it up. I think Koki was the best of the three brothers too, shame.Comment
-
Comment
-
People are selecting Broner, but is he not one of the top 5 guys in his weight class?
How many guys would you take to beat Broner in that weight class? I think the only two guys that are better are Crawford and Postol. But I'll take him over Figueroa, Troyanovsky, Provo and Lucas etc.
Guys like Liam Smith, I can go 20 deep with fighters that could likely beat this guy in his weight class. He's the quintessential paper champion.Comment
-
Talent:
Ovill McKenzie is a journeyman who had 11 days to prepare for Ramirez and took him to a draw, one could argue he won. So, I'd say in terms of talent he is absolute dog s.hit.
Least Deserving:
Broner. Needs no explanation.
Opposition:
Kell Brook, I mean damn.Comment
Comment