Tweet
It's possible we'll see a more aggressive Wlad, but unless Fury has suddenly turned into Mariusz Wach the result isn't going to be any different. Wlad just isn't a natural brawler and due to his age and natural proclivities he's going to expend a huge amount of energy upping his workrate to the level needed to trouble Fury. Fury, on the other hand, can let Wlad burn himself out then wear him down and force a stoppage. Not a clean one punch KO, but a grinding Ross Purritty style beat down where Wlad's exhaustion plays as much a part as the fists being detonated on his face.
-
-
...
You obviously know nothing about his career. Early in his career he was all out and basically pummeled and took out opponents. He later adapted his style we know from his championship reign where he had a very high KO ratio, 'boring' or not.
Your post is just regurgitation of what all boring Vladimir haters has used over the years. He has been a great champion, like his style or not.Comment
-
Did I say Mayweather is an exciting fighter? I said his typical fight looks exciting compared to Fury/Klitschko.
For you guys it was exciting to watch Wlad finally get beaten and that's fine, but the rest of us thought the fight where fighters stared at each other most of the time was boring, sue us!
And
at you and denium (two known Klitschko detractors on this forum) jerking each other off in this thread.
Comment
-
I am not a hater at all. Either you're young and haven't watched too many HW fights or you lead a pretty mundane life to think he's remotely entertaining to watch. Sorry, just my opinion. Thanks....
You obviously know nothing about his career. Early in his career he was all out and basically pummeled and took out opponents. He later adapted his style we know from his championship reign where he had a very high KO ratio, 'boring' or not.
Your post is just regurgitation of what all boring Vladimir haters has used over the years. He has been a great champion, like his style or not.Comment
-
A known Klitschko detractor? I've always given a fair assessment of WK, I've always had him in my top 10 - 20 heavyweights of all time. You on the other hand are a Klitard who believes both Klitschko brothers are the 2 best heavyweights of all time and would beat anyone. People like you refuse to give Fury any credit for kicking WK's ass and instead choose to attack Fury and make excuses for your hero.Did I say Mayweather is an exciting fighter? I said his typical fight looks exciting compared to Fury/Klitschko.
For you guys it was exciting to watch Wlad finally get beaten and that's fine, but the rest of us thought the fight where fighters stared at each other most of the time was boring, sue us!
And at you and denium (two known Klitschko detractors on this forum) jerking each other off in this thread.
I genuinely found that fight exciting, I'm a fan of clean chess match type fights where a knockout can happen anytime. A couple of years ago people were calling that Haye vs Klitschko fight boring but I really liked that fight and have watched it several times. The sort of fights I don't like are ones with a lot of clinches like the Povetkin fight, or when someone pitches and absolute shut out and can't knock the other guy out like mayweather. Fury is fun to watch, you never know what to expect from him but every round has a high degree of anticipation because he does have a shaky chin and anything can happen. He's also freakish in the way he can move for someone that big and unlike Klitschko he's not scared of throwing.Comment
-
Not once have I said they're the GOATs and that they'd beat anyone, stop making stuff up.
I have given Fury credit for that fight multiple times. But I won't call that fight a masterclass or an exciting fight because that would be a lie on my part.
Fury hardcores on the other hand, they seem to think a win over Klitschko is not enough and need to make **** up to big up a win that is already pretty big.
Fury used to be fun to watch, but I haven't seen an exciting fight with him since 2013 when he fought Cunningham.Comment
Comment