Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Haye: If Fury Loses, He's Just a Guy Who Talks A lot

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
    If Fury loses its because Wlads that good....lets be real...Fury is a top 3 depending on personal opinion where you rank him....Based on what I see...I have him at number 3....



    Joshua
    Povetkin
    Fury


    would be my personal rankings.




    Fury losing proves nothing but wlads superiority nothing more.


    Stylistically...fury may pose more threat than Povetkin? I don't know..Hes definatly a top 3 otherwise he wouldn't be there....Wilder is another story.Another what if!
    Joshua? wut? It's really optimistic to even put him in the top 15
    Last edited by ////; 11-26-2015, 07:37 PM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Holy **** that's funny coming from him.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Cinci Champ View Post
        i dont know about all that. haye is obviously jealous that fury is a bigger star in boxing then he is. if fury losses but gives a good account of himself his star will still rise and if he wins hes a superstar. so i dont agree with haye at all in this.

        Exactly...And I don't agree with Haye that Fury has a punchers chance. We all know who the puncher is in this fight.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Slowhand View Post
          This time I think Haye is wrong. Fury is special, a shining example of how the special people can achieve great things. And if he fails this Saturday he can always become the greatest karaoke host ever! - But seriously, we really have no idea how good or how awful Fury really is. Chisora was just an empty shell in their second fight so.. it will be interesting. Power and experience of Wlad will probably just be too much for Fury.
          That's how I feel sorta. He seems to have improved his boxing skills and he appears to have a variety of skills to resort to if his plan A isn't working. I'm just a bit sceptical about how good his skills really are, especially once he starts getting hit by Klitschko.

          But you're right about him being "special". With his brain, he belongs right alongside the other special needs people of the world. When Klitschko beats him, maybe the only place he'll be competitive will be the special olympics.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Bob Weaver View Post
            I was interested to hear Haye talking about Fury’s strengths as an insight to his mind and what he felt he was facing when they were planning a fight. It seems Haye does actually respect fury as a fighter.....probably even more than he's earned, despite the bad mouthing.
            Haye doesn't understand **** about Fury or boxers in general. Puncher's chance? GTFO with that kindergarten crap. His simple mind can't conceive of anything other than landing one big shot on Wlad's 'china chin' as a viable way to beat him, which is why he got it so spectacularly wrong on the night. Rather than taking that knowledge and learning from it he continues to spout off as if it's 2009. Fury's already leagues ahead of Haye tactically, which is why he's going to do a lot better than his ****** ass suggests. Haye needs to take his crap knowledge of boxing and his ****ty attitude to life in general and go somewhere where the sun don't shin. I suggest Adam Booth's **** cavity. Boxing most certainly doesn't need him any more.

            Comment


            • #36
              I don't think this is hypocrisy. Yes, Haye talked a good fight and came up very short, but he was a unified cruiserweight champion and he beat a much bigger man for the WBA heavyweight belt. His achievements stand regardless of the fact that he couldn't get near beating Wlad. But what will Fury have to fall back on if he loses this? A win over a much smaller Steve Cunningham? Two victories over an unmotivated and out of shape Derek Chisora?

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Raonic View Post
                Holy **** that's funny coming from him.
                My thoughts exactly. Haye really drove home a point about himself with that comment.

                Haye the part time fighter part time 'celebrity', gets accused of talking his way into his biggest fight, blows it and then talks his way out of it with his toe...disappears for a few years and says this about the next guy. Irony at its finest.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Enzo Mc is **** View Post
                  I don't think this is hypocrisy. Yes, Haye talked a good fight and came up very short, but he was a unified cruiserweight champion and he beat a much bigger man for the WBA heavyweight belt. His achievements stand regardless of the fact that he couldn't get near beating Wlad. But what will Fury have to fall back on if he loses this? A win over a much smaller Steve Cunningham? Two victories over an unmotivated and out of shape Derek Chisora?
                  You mean he sc****d past the worst HW champion ever, one of the worst fights that I've ever seen, and who was soundly beaten by an ancient and shot to bits Evander Holyfield the very fight before.

                  As for cruiserweight, it was a division full of bums, his best CW win is Enzo Mac lol.

                  Comment


                  • #39

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Johnwoo8686 View Post
                      I actually like Haye but this statement is ****** coming from him. Fury is the exact same boat Haye was in four years ago. Does Haye not see the irony of his statement?
                      No? the man is arrogant. Personification of the term hateful cunt.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP