Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Little Rigo says he's too small for Lomachenko.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
    Yeah I remember that. And I'm sure there was a follow-up article where Lomachenko did agree to it.

    I don't think there should be a rehydration clause anyway. I doubt you would be waving your pom poms for it if Golovkin asked Ward for one.

    For some reason Rigo is allowed to play these games without getting criticised.
    There isnt anything coming up when I google "Lomachenko agrees rehydration clause" except for a series of articles saying he is rejecting the clause.

    Either way we still need to remember this was Hyde negotiating not Rigondeaux.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by LomaUsykKlichko View Post
      Lomachenko says in this video that they agreed to the rehydration clause which was 10 pounds.
      http://********/XeCnfYPXzjI
      Thanks. I was sure he had eventually agreed to it. Even though I don't feel he needs to.

      If Rigo wants to fight him, he should fight him at the full weight. A lot of fans in here defending catchweight and rehydration clauses all of a sudden.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Tom Cruise View Post
        There isnt anything coming up when I google "Lomachenko agrees rehydration clause" except for a series of articles saying he is rejecting the clause.

        Either way we still need to remember this was Hyde negotiating not Rigondeaux.
        http://********/XeCnfYPXzjI
        Loma talks in this video how Rigo team where putting stepping stones in this fight first about the money then about the weight then about the rehydration clause and Lomas team agreed to everything

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by LomaUsykKlichko View Post
          Lomachenko says in this video that they agreed to the rehydration clause which was 10 pounds.
          http://********/XeCnfYPXzjI
          Not according to Klimas who said he spoke to Lomachenko about the clause and he rejected it.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Tom Cruise View Post
            Not according to Klimas who said he spoke to Lomachenko about the clause and he rejected it.
            Yeah this video was after, their called negotiations for a reason

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
              Yeah I remember that. And I'm sure there was a follow-up article where Lomachenko did agree to it.

              I don't think there should be a rehydration clause anyway. I doubt you would be waving your pom poms for it if Golovkin asked Ward for one.

              For some reason Rigo is allowed to play these games without getting criticised.
              Lol era are you talking about "follow up article" you used an article that was proven wrong. The only follow up is arum blamed caribe not rigo

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by LomaUsykKlichko View Post
                Yeah this video was after, their called negotiations for a reason
                So the only proof is a video in a hallway of Lomachenko being interviewed?

                No press releases that Rigo or Hyde could have replied to?

                Seems sketchy to me

                And I say it again, the one negotiating this fight was Gary Hyde, not Rigondeaux. Hyde was not in contact with Rigondeaux. All the articles and press releases from these negotiations are Hydes words

                Comment


                • #48
                  Whats the rehydration clause?

                  Depending on what that is it doesn't seem like an awful offer. Rigo is definitely tiny as f#ck. He seems small for a 122lber. This isn't a big money fight, but its a big respect fight for Loma if he wins it so I don't think its an awful idea to make some attempt at discussing details & finding a reasonable outcome for all sides to make the fight happen.

                  If it isn't agreeable fair enough, but I think its a interesting enough fight that all sides should talk. Behind the scenes doe, not in public, I tend to think most fights with TR involved that don't happen don't happen cuz too much **** has been pushed into the media/public at large & too many people involved get butthurt & start angling towards drama & bs over just making the f#cking fight.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                    Thanks. I was sure he had eventually agreed to it. Even though I don't feel he needs to.

                    If Rigo wants to fight him, he should fight him at the full weight. A lot of fans in here defending catchweight and rehydration clauses all of a sudden.
                    If they make sense then why not?

                    I dont see why they are such a huge deal.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
                      Lol era are you talking about "follow up article" you used an article that was proven wrong. The only follow up is arum blamed caribe not rigo
                      The guy posted the video. Yeah of course...it's never Rigo's fault.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP