How can anyone rank GGG over Kovalev or Wlad?

[BOXEO _]

Ask Jim Lampley, smh.

[Jedi Vader]

DeGale is 29, 4 years younger than Golovkin. He beat Andre Dirrell, better than anyone on GGG's resume.

The majority of GGG's opponents are low quality fighters. Murray is a good fighter, that's about the only guy. GGG has a good resume for a fighter in his 20s. Not a guy with 400 amateur fights, 33 years old, 9 years as a pro and will be in pro boxing for a decade in June 2016. I think that when DeGale gets to the 10 year mark in his pro career, he will have a significantly better resume than Golovkin at 10 years.

Tremendously and emphatically put.

[just the facts]

Dirrel is better, why because you say he is?

Dirrel is a mental midget who hasn't beaten anyone at all.

So exactly who on gggs less than stellar resume is a better fighter than Dirrel?

[just the facts]

Froch is a caveman, a natural 168lb Geale's gives Froch absolute hell. You act like Froch is Marvin Hagker when he lost to a guy Calzaghe toyed with.

Froch isn't on that level where I just assume he wins. He was getting ass kicked by Jermaine Tayler, humiliated by Ward, struggled with a prospect Dirrel, got put on his ass by Groves, went to war with Groves the second time, couldn't put away an old Glen Johnson, and would have been Calzaghe's bytch had they fought.

Froch is good and I would favor him over Geale due to size but Froch ain't GGG and he ain't Cotto. He doesn't process half the skills they do.

But a natural and prime 168 Geale gives Froch hell and anyone who knows boxing knows that.

The same Geale that got his lights put out by Cotto? You're really reaching with this one.............

[SilverMiles]

So exactly who on gggs less than stellar resume is a better fighter than Dirrel?

First, what makes Dirrell a great fighter. He very limited for one and has no heart.

And not putting down Dirrell but don't understand why the SMW version of NDaM is such a great win.

Second, Cotto is a HOF, stand out amateur, and world class. He presented speed Geale never saw before and had to drop down in weight.

Froch is none of that. And Hatton got his lights put out by Manny. Does that mean everything he did in his career before that was meaningless.

[j0zef]

Fighting in that weak division he is in, he better be winning in a more dominant fashion than what Kovalev did against the tougher Pascal, Hopkins, Cleverly. Rubio, Geale, Stevens, Lemiuex are completely different levels than what is available at 168-175. A lower level.

Disagree. The whole 'MW is weak' is simply not true, especially when compared to SMW and LHW. SMW has aging AA, chunky, Jack and Dirrell. Not an impressive list. There's a thread on these forums talking about how weak SMW is.
LHW is even worse. It's literally Kovalev, Ward and a protected, aging Adonis.

Pascal lost to 50 year old Hopkins, and Cleverly is far from impressive. He's basically Geale :-/

[Bardock]

fanboys will be fanboys.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

First, what makes Dirrell a great fighter. He very limited for one and has no heart.

And not putting down Dirrell but don't understand why the SMW version of NDaM is such a great win.

Second, Cotto is a HOF, stand out amateur, and world class. He presented speed Geale never saw before and had to drop down in weight.

Froch is none of that. And Hatton got his lights put out by Manny. Does that mean everything he did in his career before that was meaningless.

This guy is laugh-a-minute

[DannYankee]

Because Hype man! The hype factor can't be discounted.

[SilverMiles]

This guy is laugh-a-minute

I know it was pretty funny comparing a career loser to an former titlist lmao.