its not innocent life its just a stage of the process which culminates in life.
Life has already been 'culminated' at that point.
Originally posted by FlatLine
do you feel guilty every time you've had a wank and killed millions of innocent living *****? well then.
I'm strongly in favour of reclaiming the word 'wanker' actually. Until recent times the term wanker meant exactly what it said on the tin, ie a wanker was a hopeless pathetic cnut that in his utter desperation of not being able to get a women had to resort to pathetically wanking himself off silly, an excuse of a man really. I say let's reclaim the word, let's take it back.
Life has been "culminated" prior to that point since ***** is living matter with 23 chromosomes and can survive outside the human body for up to an hour in the open air. You have essentially created millions of new life forms every time a nut is bust. Why no sympathy for those innocent little critters?
Originally posted by Arthur Daley
I'm strongly in favour of reclaiming the word 'wanker' actually. Until recent times the term wanker meant exactly what it said on the tin, ie a wanker was a hopeless pathetic cnut that in his utter desperation of not being able to get a women had to resort to pathetically wanking himself off silly, an excuse of a man really. I say let's reclaim the word, let's take it back.
The pejorative use of the term "wanker" is somewhat distinct in tone from the use of the word I handily employed, "wank", in a common sentence these days. "Wank" is the act itself while "wanker" is the excessive utilization of that act.
Yes that's the ultra materialistic stance that I have a problem with. Ie your post basically read "i'm a hopeless slag and can't be arsed dealing with my responsibilities due to materialistic reasons so I'll just end a life instead because i'm a cnut basically."
you only give a damn bc u have your nose in someone elses business...gay on the other hand is right in your face...walkin around your park kssing each other while innocent young minds watch
You need to catch up man. There are literally videos older than you showing the entire process of ********. They show the baby inside the stomach and the baby is clearly scared for its life, avoiding the instrument used to kill it. It feels the sharp object stabbing it little by little and it dies a slow painful death. I was also for ******** when I was younger, when I thought the baby gets killed with some pill or something. When I saw the babies reaction to getting stabbed by the doctor, I changed my mind completely.
doesnt change mine..its not that baby's right to come out of that person if it wants to..and im sure they showed you a graphic image to do that to you, but it is much more simple..they baited you
doesnt change mine..its not that baby's right to come out of that person if it wants to..and im sure they showed you a graphic image to do that to you, but it is much more simple..they baited you
What did they bait me with? You said a baby in the stomach is not a living thing, that is literally false. The way a baby is killed in ******** is with a sharp object, there's videos on youtube showing real ********s. They insert a sharp long needle like object into the stomach and stab the baby to death. The baby is clearly shown in fear and actually learning about the sharp object poking it, and then learns to avoid it and dodge it in fear, but ultimately gets poked to death.
******** by stabbing is one of those crazy things that will be looked at 100s of years from now, just like we look at trephination now(Drilling a hole in someone's skull to release the "demons" from their body, when they were just mentally ill). Despite so many people being against ********, most people are still primitive about it. These are the same people that will be talked about as "crazy and ******" centuries from now.
Comment