Surely he has a better resume and is more active than AT LEAST 4. At the least I think he deserves the #10 spot. Your thoughts?
Why isn't Tim Bradley on Rings p4p rankings?
Collapse
-
-
I've never viewed him as a P4P level fighter but he deserves to be on their more than a lot of others on the "official" rankings by Ring Magazine.
People keep saying he's looked bad in his last couple of fights. When has he ever looked dominating? He always seems to make a meal of every fight.Comment
-
-
-
Recently beat two B-level fighters, going to beat a 3rd now. If he beats Brook or wins @ 154, then move him up into Top 5 again.
He takes NO breaks. His last break was Casamayor.
He's been fighting world class fighters nonstop just like Floyd/Manny.
He's just so unoriginal, but got so much hustle, he forced his way into P4P status.
Larry, Dirk, you two are moronsComment
-
I just recently noticed that he wasn't on the p4p list and wondered the exact same thing. No, he hasn't looked dominant in his last few fights. I think its very hard to get up for guys like Chaves, Vargas, and now Rios when you have been in the ring with hall of famers like Pacquiao and Marquez. He needs a bigger challenge. But still, other than Manny and Ward, he has the best resume of active fighters in the sport. If all around body of work is considered, he should at least be ranked 3 or 4. How does GGG, Brook, and Khan make the list and not Tim??? Yes GGG has looked dominant and very impressive, but against who??? He has never faced an opponent on the level of Marquez and Pacquiao. Hell, in all honesty, he hasn't even faced an opponent on the level of Peterson, Alexander(at his best), or Provodnikov. The p4p list by Ring used to be respectable. Now it seems they have an agenda.Comment
-
Comment