Comments Thread For: Rios: Brook Gets His Ass Handed To Him By Amir Khan

[MisanthropicNY]

Rios shut up you knew brook would beat your ass that's why you are ran from the fight Bradley will end you

Rios fought the Pacquiao who whooped Cotto's ass...doubt he'd be afraid of cherry-picking clincher Brook...

[davef]

brook had just come back from being stabbed in the leg rios you slack jawed bum of course he was going to take easy fights in all honesty i think jo jo dan and gavin give rios fits nothing but a punchbag whos career will be remember for going to war with alvarado and then crying when pacquiao beat him up

[thack]

Can you believe Khan is YOUNGER than Brook?

Look at Khan's record and how long he's been arond and compare to Brook, who came out of the woodwork a couple years ago and has a "prospect" record.

Khan is goofy and chinny but he's what makes boxing interesting. If guys just sat around like Brook nobody would care anymore.

You make no sense , Khan has had just one (poor) outing this year and you call him interesting ?

[////]

You make no sense , Khan has had just one (poor) outing this year and you call him interesting ?

Khan age 28: Barrera, Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Maidana, Judah, Peterson, Garcia, Collazo, Alexander, Algieri (say what you want about him but he beat Provodnikov in a title fight when nobody else would step up)

Brook age 29: Porter

Brook is everything wrong with boxing. An "undefeated champion" who is both undefeated and champion because he's been coddled his entire career.

Brook literally isn't even worthy of fighting Khan right now. When he was riding off the Porter fight it was feasible but he's now back to NOBODY status.

How can we weigh Khan's losses against him when he's had literally 10 times more meaningful fights than Brook?

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Khan age 28: Barrera, Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Maidana, Judah, Peterson, Garcia, Collazo, Alexander, Algieri

Brook age 29: Porter

Brook is everything wrong with boxing. An "undefeated champion" who is both undefeated and champion because he's been coddled his entire career.

Brook literally isn't even worthy of fighting Khan right now. When he was riding off the Porter fight it was feasible but he's now back to NOBODY status.

How can we weigh Khan's losses against him when he's had literally 10 times more meaningful fights than Brook?

There are some champions approaching their mid-30s who don't even have a Porter level win yet. And people think they are much bigger stars and worthy of big fights.

[////]

There are some champions approaching their mid-30s who don't even have a Porter level win yet. And people think they are much bigger stars and worthy of big fights.

Deontay Wilder?

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Deontay Wilder?

He's still in his late 20s.

[wlliam]

Khan age 28: Barrera, Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Maidana, Judah, Peterson, Garcia, Collazo, Alexander, Algieri (say what you want about him but he beat Provodnikov in a title fight when nobody else would step up)

Brook age 29: Porter

Brook is everything wrong with boxing. An "undefeated champion" who is both undefeated and champion because he's been coddled his entire career.

Brook literally isn't even worthy of fighting Khan right now. When he was riding off the Porter fight it was feasible but he's now back to NOBODY status.

How can we weigh Khan's losses against him when he's had literally 10 times more meaningful fights than Brook?

I love how u Khantrrds drop names and totally ignore the context..look at Barrera for instance the best name on that list hadnt been in contention for 5yrs at the time Khan faced him, Collazo hadnt been in contention for 8 fkn yrs by the time he faced Khan...8yrs!!! 2 less than 10!!! Dude thats how the rest of Kgans reseme looks...theres only 2 fighters Khan had faced who had excellent standing when the Con-man faced em...can u guess who they were??? Ding! Ding! Ding! Peterson and Garcia!!

Youve been Khan'd!!!

[PowerFlow]

I like rios. Yes he is one dimensional. But he's very good at that one dimension. I'd always favor a more well rounded boxer like Brook over a in your face brawler like rios, but people need to stop disrespecting him. I promise everyone here if rios and Brook fought it would not be an easy fight for Brook

[Box-Office]

I love how u Khantrrds drop names and totally ignore the context..look at Barrera for instance the best name on that list hadnt been in contention for 5yrs at the time Khan faced him, Collazo hadnt been in contention for 8 fkn yrs by the time he faced Khan...8yrs!!! 2 less than 10!!! Dude thats how the rest of Kgans reseme looks...theres only 2 fighters Khan had faced who had excellent standing when the Con-man faced em...can u guess who they were??? Ding! Ding! Ding! Peterson and Garcia!!

Youve been Khan'd!!!

Collazo was Khan's first fight at WW, at the time he was given props for taking it cuz he was coming off a win himself. It is only after Khan dominated him that he became a bum. Just like Alexander is now a bum.


You can say the same thing about Jose Luis Castillo when he fought Hatton, except Barrera was called a stepping stone and Castillo one of Hatton's career defining wins.



Are you really someone to teach anyone about "context"?