[real talk]its not that hard to determine who the real p5p #1 is when using logic,

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PivotandRoll
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2015
    • 2540
    • 98
    • 26
    • 9,327

    #41
    Originally posted by jreckoning
    Wlad would fight a lot different if he were 5'6 you stupic ****SUCKER.

    So would Rigo if he were 6'6.

    That's why it's ****** to compare that way.

    Historically p4p was never about if so an so was x and so and so was y.
    Historically yes it was! It was invented basically to compare Robinson to Hw's of the day....

    Someone tell Postol he should fight differently because he's a WW....What a clown...

    Comment

    • PivotandRoll
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2015
      • 2540
      • 98
      • 26
      • 9,327

      #42
      Originally posted by rambov
      Vlad would not. 90% of his advantage is his height and jab dude
      nah bro this the Resume4Resume list now... though how Wlad ever stacks up in that either I would like to know

      Comment

      • Guest
        • 0
        • 0
        • 0

        #43
        Originally posted by PivotandRoll
        Historically yes it was! It was invented basically to compare Robinson to Hw's of the day....

        Someone tell Postol he should fight differently because he's a WW....What a clown...
        You use different skills based on your attributes.

        It's meaningless anyways. You clearly have a different definition of what p4p is.

        Comment

        • PivotandRoll
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2015
          • 2540
          • 98
          • 26
          • 9,327

          #44
          Originally posted by jreckoning
          You use different skills based on your attributes.

          It's meaningless anyways. You clearly have a different definition of what p4p is.
          Yeah I have the right one...You have the one that suits your agenda..

          Comment

          • rambov
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2007
            • 3598
            • 102
            • 49
            • 12,413

            #45
            Originally posted by PivotandRoll
            nah bro this the Resume4Resume list now... though how Wlad ever stacks up in that either I would like to know
            I was responding to jreckoning

            Comment

            • -MAKAVELLI-
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Aug 2008
              • 50080
              • 3,580
              • 2,792
              • 169,000

              #46
              Originally posted by PivotandRoll
              Yeah but that's because you're an idiot....A HW even at a Salido level of talent would Knock Wlad's head off in a second

              Sure he would...find another sport to pretend to know

              Comment

              • PivotandRoll
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2015
                • 2540
                • 98
                • 26
                • 9,327

                #47
                Originally posted by jreckoning
                You use different skills based on your attributes.

                It's meaningless anyways. You clearly have a different definition of what p4p is.
                Okay try think about this ....just as a conceptual exercise...

                Who is the better technical boxer/More Effective fighter? Floyd Mayweather or Juan Manuel Marquez?

                Comment

                • Guest
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  • 0

                  #48
                  Originally posted by PivotandRoll
                  Yeah I have the right one...You have the one that suits your agenda..

                  There are different criteria. All based on skills. Meaningless because people use different skills based on what nature gave them.

                  If someone is hyper successful with the skills he uses, I think he's better than a guy that doesn't.

                  Ratings are subjective not right or wrong.

                  Comment

                  • PivotandRoll
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2015
                    • 2540
                    • 98
                    • 26
                    • 9,327

                    #49
                    Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI-
                    Sure he would...find another sport to pretend to know
                    Name one guy on his resume that will be higher in the p4p rankings when it's all done....Don't worry I know there's no one (well maybe haye will be gifted it)

                    Comment

                    • PivotandRoll
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jan 2015
                      • 2540
                      • 98
                      • 26
                      • 9,327

                      #50
                      Originally posted by jreckoning
                      There are different criteria. All based on skills. Meaningless because people use different skills based on what nature gave them.

                      If someone is hyper successful with the skills he uses, I think he's better than a guy that doesn't.

                      Ratings are subjective not right or wrong.
                      Yes but the pound4pound system is only one thing and you like many people have the common misunderstanding of it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP