If GGG wanted 3 tune ups at 168

**Larry the boss** · 10-08-2015, 10:18 AM

As long as the Ward fight was apart of the deal then fine,whats wrong with that?

**Jc8804** · 10-08-2015, 10:19 AM

Im just giving everyone a chance to be able to give their opinion if it differs

**Larry the boss** · 10-08-2015, 10:20 AM

Originally posted by Jc8804

Im just giving everyone a chance to be able to give their opinion if it differs

Kovalevs own promoter said it would be at the end of 2016 months ago,but no one wanted to believe it

**The Big Dunn** · 10-08-2015, 10:23 AM

GGG has had 33 tune ups at 160, why would he need 3 at 168?

**Johnny2x2x** · 10-08-2015, 10:23 AM

Originally posted by Jc8804

How would it be viewed if he wanted a year vs tune ups at 168?

Considering GGG has had 34 tuneups at 160, I think his fans would be OK with it.

**Larry the boss** · 10-08-2015, 10:23 AM

Originally posted by The Big Dunn

GGG has had 33 tune ups at 160, why would he need 3 at 168?

If a fighter is moving up in weight i dont see an issue with adjusting to the weight

**PK3434** · 10-08-2015, 10:24 AM

He wouldn't. A GGG "tune up" fight is a last resort when nobody else will fight him.

However, for 168, I think 1 tune up fight is acceptable, definitely not 2 or 3...just like I think one tune up fight is ok for Ward at 175.

**Jc8804** · 10-08-2015, 10:27 AM

Ward just had a tune up at 175. I can understand 1 more. I just dont understamd wasting all these tv slots for tune ups. Hopefully they are co features

**HanzGruber** · 10-08-2015, 10:38 AM

His whole career has been tune ups

If GGG wanted 3 tune ups at 168