Textbook boxer.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • VG_Addict
    king meat's twin
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2012
    • 5618
    • 237
    • 3
    • 53,380

    #1

    Textbook boxer.

    What modern fighters would you say are the best examples of the textbook pure boxer?
  • Dip_Slide
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2015
    • 2655
    • 240
    • 11
    • 34,495

    #2
    Mikey Garcia.

    The best textbook fighter of all times however is Ricardo Lopez.

    Comment

    • New England
      Strong champion.
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2010
      • 37514
      • 1,926
      • 1,486
      • 97,173

      #3
      Originally posted by Dip_Slide
      Mikey Garcia.

      The best textbook fighter of all times however is Ricardo Lopez.



      this is a good answer. mikey is a very orthodox fighter. it works for hiim because his fundamentals are so good, and he has so much power.

      after his layoff i wonder about him making lower weights, and question his effectiveness at higher ones.


      i think the fighter with the best footwork in boxing is vasyl lomachenko. he's got a very european style, which hasn't really made it into the "textbook" yet, but he's got he athleticism and footspeed to move like an american fighter, and he does.

      Comment

      • New England
        Strong champion.
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2010
        • 37514
        • 1,926
        • 1,486
        • 97,173

        #4
        as for some all time examples, you have donald curry, floyd mayweather, alexis arguello, joe louis, benny leonard, harold johnson.


        here's an interesting one:
        mike tyson.

        really?
        really. tyson was a very "textbook" heavyweight in his prime. you can tell that he was schooled to throw all of those combinations with the "numbers system" that cus d'amato used.

        Comment

        • Dip_Slide
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2015
          • 2655
          • 240
          • 11
          • 34,495

          #5
          Originally posted by New England
          as for some all time examples, you have donald curry, floyd mayweather, alexis arguello, joe louis, benny leonard, harold johnson.


          here's an interesting one:
          mike tyson.

          really?
          really. tyson was a very "textbook" heavyweight in his prime. you can tell that he was schooled to throw all of those combinations with the "numbers system" that cus d'amato used.
          Floyd Mayweather is definitley not a textbook fighter, he's a pretty sophisticated fighter who does things that only he does, Alexis Arguello however is also a great answer, one of my all time favorites.

          Comment

          • New England
            Strong champion.
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2010
            • 37514
            • 1,926
            • 1,486
            • 97,173

            #6
            Originally posted by Dip_Slide
            Floyd Mayweather is definitley not a textbook fighter, he's a pretty sophisticated fighter who does things that only he does, Alexis Arguello however is also a great answer, one of my all time favorites.

            he's not a textbook fighter because he defends his chin with his shoulder to invite right hands?


            there's no "textbook" for boxing, and if there it is evolves based on the gloves they used, the amount of clinching allowed, the size of the rings, which have all varied throughout history and changed the ways guys fight.


            guys who are guided by and stick to their own principals are textbook. floyd sticks to the "mayweather school of boxing." it's not a wild, unorthodox style. it's carefully planned out. you can call it "blueprinted" if you like.

            floyd throws [threw in his prime] perfect punches. he's on balance in constancy. he knows exactly where you are, and fights accordingly.



            ali wasn't a textbook fighter. he was never all that tough to hit, particularly considering how long his arms were, and how fast his feet were. he'd sit on the ropes in the 70's. in the 60's he'd pull straight back when he was in range, and sometimes he'd get tagged. he'd wing punches, paw / row iwth the jab. he got away with it because of his gifts, and he got hit a lot once they faded.


            floyd isn't like that. he throws the right hand straigt, the left hook short, and the jab coms straight home




            to give oyu a good idea of how well the book works, and how dedicated a fighter is to the book, look at hopkins and floyd, two guys who don't fight with their hands up all the time.


            as they aged, and their reflexes went, they were still ahrd to hit. why? it's because of their fundamental base. it starts with the feet, and ends with your eyes. your feet need to be able to put you into a position to capitalize on what your eye can see. as your brain slows, you've got a better chance of avoiding trouble if you're not simply reacting, but have a planned set of possible outcomes. you get those plans from your textbook.


            tl; dr:

            floyd isn't "not textbook" simply because he keep his lead hand low.

            Comment

            • NEETzsche
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Oct 2011
              • 8389
              • 283
              • 176
              • 29,441

              #7
              you could say mayweather memorised the textbook and then rewrote parts of it. his form and stance is absolutely perfect all the time

              Comment

              • Dip_Slide
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2015
                • 2655
                • 240
                • 11
                • 34,495

                #8
                Originally posted by New England
                he's not a textbook fighter because he defends his chin with his shoulder to invite right hands?


                there's no "textbook" for boxing, and if there it is evolves based on the gloves they used, the amount of clinching allowed, the size of the rings, which have all varied throughout history and changed the ways guys fight.


                guys who are guided by and stick to their own principals are textbook. floyd sticks to the "mayweather school of boxing." it's not a wild, unorthodox style. it's carefully planned out. you can call it "blueprinted" if you like.

                floyd throws [threw in his prime] perfect punches. he's on balance in constancy. he knows exactly where you are, and fights accordingly.



                ali wasn't a textbook fighter. he was never all that tough to hit, particularly considering how long his arms were, and how fast his feet were. he'd sit on the ropes in the 70's. in the 60's he'd pull straight back when he was in range, and sometimes he'd get tagged. he'd wing punches, paw / row iwth the jab. he got away with it because of his gifts, and he got hit a lot once they faded.


                floyd isn't like that. he throws the right hand straigt, the left hook short, and the jab coms straight home




                to give oyu a good idea of how well the book works, and how dedicated a fighter is to the book, look at hopkins and floyd, two guys who don't fight with their hands up all the time.


                as they aged, and their reflexes went, they were still ahrd to hit. why? it's because of their fundamental base. it starts with the feet, and ends with your eyes. your feet need to be able to put you into a position to capitalize on what your eye can see. as your brain slows, you've got a better chance of avoiding trouble if you're not simply reacting, but have a planned set of possible outcomes. you get those plans from your textbook.


                tl; dr:

                floyd isn't "not textbook" simply because he keep his lead hand low.
                No fighter sets traps, rolls and counters, moves back on his feet, uses the check hook, leads with the straight right without setting it up with the jab, leads with a leaping hook or jabs to the body the way Floyd Mayweather does, I've never seen a fighter do or let alone combine all these things like Floyd Mayweather, and if you're the only one who does something, this means u r not a textbook guy.

                Not saying he invented everything he does, but him combining all these different things and using them at the right time is definetly not textbook.

                Comment

                • VapeRippa
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 300
                  • 52
                  • 29
                  • 8,307

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Dip_Slide
                  No fighter sets traps, rolls and counters, moves back on his feet, uses the check hook, leads with the straight right without setting it up with the jab, leads with a leaping hook or jabs to the body the way Floyd Mayweather does, I've never seen a fighter do or let alone combine all these things like Floyd Mayweather, and if you're the only one who does something, this means u r not a textbook guy.

                  Not saying he invented everything he does, but him combining all these different things and using them at the right time is definetly not textbook.
                  NE got owned and don't know ish about boxing.

                  Comment

                  • Larry the boss
                    EDUCATED
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 90798
                    • 6,419
                    • 4,473
                    • 2,500,480

                    #10
                    Mikey Garcia definitely..Roman Gonzalez

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP