Originally posted by enadeus
So when Hatton low blows Kosta its coo, but when zab does floyd hes a piece of ****?
Collapse
-
you have a bad attitude, thinking everyone is against you and your Russian fighters. you've defended Tszyu in every thread so far today. eventually you have to back down and give somebody else credit. calling Hatton's actions vile is just biased. -
-
I partially agreeOriginally posted by moraleskospacisbacki dont think no foul is better then the next one, a foul is a foul in the sport of boxing, nothing justifys a foul.
I think all fouls call for some penalty, point deduction, dq, whichever is appropriate
but I also think that throwing an intentional low blow to someone who is fighting clean makes you a piece of ****, while retaliating does not.
(example: in hopkins-dlh, oscar low blows hopkins at some point. Given hopkins history in fouling, I did not think for a second that oscar was a piece of ****)Comment
-
excellent point. Hatton retaliated. Judah was not retaliating.Originally posted by wmuteI partially agree
I think all fouls call for some penalty, point deduction, dq, whichever is appropriate
but I also think that throwing an intentional low blow to someone who is fighting clean makes you a piece of ****, while retaliating does not.
(example: in hopkins-dlh, oscar low blows hopkins at some point. Given hopkins history in fouling, I did not think for a second that oscar was a piece of ****)Comment
-
there I go what? he quit so he's a quitter. if he's not a quitter, who is?Originally posted by enadeusThere he goes
Comment
-
I don't remember Tszyu protesting.Originally posted by enadeusHis corner called a stop to the fight in between rounds eleven and twelve.
Comment
Comment