Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why did Manny oppose to WADA back in 2010 vs Floyd?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Zaroku View Post
    Cotto fought a roided PAC. Cotto vs Canelo was closer than Cotto got credit for.
    that was a life changing ass whoopin' he gave my dude.

    cotto got back with his baby mama after that L.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by baya View Post
      that was a life changing ass whoopin' he gave my dude.

      cotto got back with his baby mama after that L.
      Then it was a very good thing for Cotto, his wife, and children!

      I think Marquez smashing PAC in their last fight, helped his relationship with his wife and kids too. I liked it how the Filipino fans greeted him like a hero after that loss. It was good for him.

      Comment


      • Pretty crazy that Cotto's first two losses came against Margarito with bricks in his gloves and Pacquiao roided to the gills.

        Comment


        • He was probably on PED's. Got two for you. Why did Floyd need the IV? Why did he get a TUE after the fact? At least be consistent. If you're going to bash Pac, bash Floyd too because there is more evidence on Floyd than on Pac.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by elgu View Post
            He was probably on PED's. Got two for you. Why did Floyd need the IV? Why did he get a TUE after the fact? At least be consistent. If you're going to bash Pac, bash Floyd too because there is more evidence on Floyd than on Pac.
            Why did De La Hoya need an IV for Pac?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
              Why did De La Hoya need an IV for Pac?
              You answered neither question. A true sign of bias.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by elgu View Post
                He was probably on PED's. Got two for you. Why did Floyd need the IV? Why did he get a TUE after the fact? At least be consistent. If you're going to bash Pac, bash Floyd too because there is more evidence on Floyd than on Pac.
                1.Because he was dehydrated. (Unless you are a medical professional and assessed him at the time don't come with any bull****)

                2. Because they are the rules which every athlete that does WADA testing follows.


                NEXT.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by elgu View Post
                  You answered neither question. A true sign of bias.
                  I was a big contributor to those 1 million response threads regarding the IV.

                  It's ok to be scared of my questions doe. Objectivity's a btch ain't it?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
                    1.Because he was dehydrated. (Unless you are a medical professional and assessed him at the time don't come with any bull****)

                    2. Because they are the rules which every athlete that does WADA testing follows.


                    NEXT.
                    He was masking roids. If he was as severely dehydrated as you claim he was the fight wouldn't have happened. Much less would Floyd have performed the way he did.

                    You never answered why he got the TUE [B]after[B] the fact. I guess thats how corrupt en****** go about their business.

                    Bug has been swapped. Who's next?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
                      I was a big contributor to those 1 million response threads regarding the IV.

                      It's ok to be scared of my questions doe. Objectivity's a btch ain't it?
                      I saw your responses and I also saw you getting owned in the process.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP