Originally posted by SugarKaineHook
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why did Manny oppose to WADA back in 2010 vs Floyd?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by GTTofAK View PostAs apposed to a long diatribe written by SugarKaineHook. You are just pissed that you got your answer. Arum didn't' trust USADA and felt that they could be bought. Time has shown him to be correct.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Postlol. ESPN ''staff'' and the article headline starts in ''quotes''
ESPN. go figure. You post a picture of a baby whining when it's clearly showing that Arum is having a fit that USADA is involved... the guys that brought down BALCO and disclosed information about Armstrong - which Armstrong never refuted.
hmmm. 2011. The year VADA was founded...
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostOnce again dumb****, Usada was never contracted by Armstrong. That'd be laughable, that's what PED suspect Floyd pulled. If it wasn't obvious it was a sham before, it is now
Who said anything about USADA being contracted by Armstrong? I didn't know USADA was exclusive to Armstrong.... lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View PostWhat part of ''disclosed information about Amrstrong'' don't you get? When Travis Tygart sat with 20/20 about donations to USADA from Armstrong isn't that disclosing information?
Who said anything about USADA being contracted by Armstrong? I didn't know USADA was exclusive to Armstrong.... lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostDamn you're dumb. In any other sport Usada is hired by the regulators to go after drug cheats. Here they're hired by a likely Ped cheat himself. The conflict if interest is overwhelming, and after the IV gate even the most naive recognize its a sham
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostDamn you're dumb. In any other sport Usada is hired by the regulators to go after drug cheats. Here they're hired by a likely Ped cheat himself. The conflict if interest is overwhelming, and after the IV gate even the most naive recognize its a sham
What?!
USADA made sure that IV drama procedures would benefit them which is why a debious plan was not well thought of and bite them back? lol
Comment
-
Fact that USADA has this confidentiality agreement with boxers means they should not be in this business at all. It's ******. Everything should be about exposing cheaters, not protecting them. Past and present opponents should be able to have the right to request the cheater's blood and urine samples and have them examined by experts. Fact that they can't just means you have an erect red flag right in front of you, which signals, "You're not allowed to enter the premises without authorization." What a dumb anti-doping company.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View PostUSADA made sure that IV drama procedures would benefit them which is why a debious plan was not well thought of and bite them back? lol
Later USADA makes up some contradictory explanation of Mayweather not being able to give a simple while at the same time arguing that they tested both before and after the IV and make up some bull**** story about a paramedic.
Comment
Comment