Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why did Manny oppose to WADA back in 2010 vs Floyd?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
    Strawman tactics from all you losers is funny. Nothing to say... typical.
    That is not a strawman argument you dumb****.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
      ESPN. go figure.
      As apposed to a long diatribe written by SugarKaineHook. You are just pissed that you got your answer. Arum didn't' trust USADA and felt that they could be bought. Time has shown him to be correct.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
        As apposed to a long diatribe written by SugarKaineHook. You are just pissed that you got your answer. Arum didn't' trust USADA and felt that they could be bought. Time has shown him to be correct.
        Who are you? Pissed from what answer? Stop following my nuts. Go write a constructive thread...if you can.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
          lol. ESPN ''staff'' and the article headline starts in ''quotes''

          ESPN. go figure. You post a picture of a baby whining when it's clearly showing that Arum is having a fit that USADA is involved... the guys that brought down BALCO and disclosed information about Armstrong - which Armstrong never refuted.

          hmmm. 2011. The year VADA was founded...
          Once again dumb****, Usada was never contracted by Armstrong. That'd be laughable, that's what PED suspect Floyd pulled. If it wasn't obvious it was a sham before, it is now

          Comment


          • Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
            Once again dumb****, Usada was never contracted by Armstrong. That'd be laughable, that's what PED suspect Floyd pulled. If it wasn't obvious it was a sham before, it is now
            What part of ''disclosed information about Amrstrong'' don't you get? When Travis Tygart sat with 20/20 about donations to USADA from Armstrong isn't that disclosing information?

            Who said anything about USADA being contracted by Armstrong? I didn't know USADA was exclusive to Armstrong.... lol

            Comment


            • Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
              What part of ''disclosed information about Amrstrong'' don't you get? When Travis Tygart sat with 20/20 about donations to USADA from Armstrong isn't that disclosing information?

              Who said anything about USADA being contracted by Armstrong? I didn't know USADA was exclusive to Armstrong.... lol
              Damn you're dumb. In any other sport Usada is hired by the regulators to go after drug cheats. Here they're hired by a likely Ped cheat himself. The conflict if interest is overwhelming, and after the IV gate even the most naive recognize its a sham

              Comment


              • Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                Damn you're dumb. In any other sport Usada is hired by the regulators to go after drug cheats. Here they're hired by a likely Ped cheat himself. The conflict if interest is overwhelming, and after the IV gate even the most naive recognize its a sham
                Nice to see some people here use their brains for thinking. Bravo.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                  Damn you're dumb. In any other sport Usada is hired by the regulators to go after drug cheats. Here they're hired by a likely Ped cheat himself. The conflict if interest is overwhelming, and after the IV gate even the most naive recognize its a sham
                  ''In any other sport USADA is hired by the 'regulators' to go after drug cheats...''

                  What?!

                  USADA made sure that IV drama procedures would benefit them which is why a debious plan was not well thought of and bite them back? lol

                  Comment


                  • Fact that USADA has this confidentiality agreement with boxers means they should not be in this business at all. It's ******. Everything should be about exposing cheaters, not protecting them. Past and present opponents should be able to have the right to request the cheater's blood and urine samples and have them examined by experts. Fact that they can't just means you have an erect red flag right in front of you, which signals, "You're not allowed to enter the premises without authorization." What a dumb anti-doping company.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
                      USADA made sure that IV drama procedures would benefit them which is why a debious plan was not well thought of and bite them back? lol
                      Simpler explanation. USADA tester finds evidence of IV and informs superiors. USADA does nothing because superiors get nice fat bonus check from the money Mayweather pays USADA. Story spreads within USADA, executives fear another leak like happened with Morales. They tell Mayweather camp to submit TUE application almost 3 weeks after the fight and it is approved in a day.

                      Later USADA makes up some contradictory explanation of Mayweather not being able to give a simple while at the same time arguing that they tested both before and after the IV and make up some bull**** story about a paramedic.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP