Why did Wlad choose Calvin Brock over Shannon Briggs when Briggs held a title?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SN!PER
    locked and loaded
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 23138
    • 1,205
    • 769
    • 107,506

    #11
    That was only 2 years after Wlad got put on his knees by Lamon Brewster.

    Briggs was considered too risky because he had a high knockout ratio.

    Comment

    • TBear
      Lords of Boxingscene
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 113275
      • 6,079
      • 12,778
      • 1,665,677,098

      #12
      From boxingscene archives'

      NEW YORK - IBF heavyweight champion Wladimir Klitschko was hit with a $5 million lawsuit Thursday over last year's canceled fight with Shannon Briggs at Madison Square Garden.

      Comment

      • beez721
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2005
        • 9637
        • 252
        • 55
        • 16,400

        #13
        Originally posted by LarryXXX
        Briggs said they turned him down and chose Brock

        https://www.facebook.com/terrell.bro...3837950509479/
        briggs didnt have any title when wlad signed to fight the undefeated brock instead. jameel mccline dropped briggs hard and won an easy decision over him while losing to brock. the brock choice was the right one. he was top 10 ranked and undefeated

        Comment

        • beez721
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2005
          • 9637
          • 252
          • 55
          • 16,400

          #14
          Originally posted by daggum
          it shouldn't be a trainers job to teach a fighter to cheat. yes he was able to get away with it because of the corrupt nature of boxing where a-sides are allowed to break rules but that doesn't mean its right.
          seems like you watch nothing but wlad/povetkin. thats the only fight where wlads clicnhing was dq worthy

          Comment

          • beez721
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2005
            • 9637
            • 252
            • 55
            • 16,400

            #15
            Originally posted by Thurman
            That was only 2 years after Wlad got put on his knees by Lamon Brewster.

            Briggs was considered too risky because he had a high knockout ratio.
            he wasnt considered too risky. brock was deemed more worthy as he was undefeated and did what briggs couldnt do. he beat mccline

            Comment

            • Larry the boss
              EDUCATED
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 90798
              • 6,419
              • 4,473
              • 2,500,480

              #16
              damn so Briggs has a point when he says he been ducking him

              Comment

              • Larry the boss
                EDUCATED
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2011
                • 90798
                • 6,419
                • 4,473
                • 2,500,480

                #17
                Originally posted by beez721
                briggs didnt have any title when wlad signed to fight the undefeated brock instead. jameel mccline dropped briggs hard and won an easy decision over him while losing to brock. the brock choice was the right one. he was top 10 ranked and undefeated
                He fought Mccline in 2002

                Comment

                • Jedi Vader
                  Lord Of The Force
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 6362
                  • 480
                  • 1,177
                  • 86,521

                  #18
                  The Klits wanted none of Valuev too.

                  On the eve of his bout with David Haye, WBA champion Nikolay Valuev discussed why a much discussed unification fight with WBC champ Vitali Klitschko didn’t happen.

                  Comment

                  • BostonGuy
                    Emeritus Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 13343
                    • 2,119
                    • 6,833
                    • 900,690,265

                    #19
                    Originally posted by LarryXXX
                    Briggs said they turned him down and chose Brock

                    https://www.facebook.com/terrell.bro...3837950509479/
                    A simple glance at Boxrec would have informed you that Briggs won the WBO title from Liakhovich on November 4, 2006 and then on the following Saturday - November 11, 2006 Wlad faced Calvin Brock to defend his IBF title.

                    Leading up to their respective fights - Briggs had faced a bum 'o the month club of opponents while Calvin Brock faced some decent opponents. Brock was also undefeated and ranked in the top 5 heavyweights during that time.

                    I've objectively followed Wladimir Klitschko for over 10 years now. I've analyzed all his fights and his style and have been critical of him at times, but also have praised him for his achievements. Klitschko never ducked Shannon Briggs. Briggs has always trolled him at pressers and tried to goad him into a fight - for which he has never deserved.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP