Comments Thread For: Bradley Warns Brook Of Tough Night Ahead Versus Chaves

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Again, looking from things after they've happened rather what they meant at the time.

Chaves has beaten no names beaten nor any titles won, Maidana had a name on his resume. A no name Argentine causing a shocker in a foreign country. May be we'll see a repeat.

At the time Ortiz had done nothing himself, he was just a hyped prospect.

Chaves is a more proven fighter than Maidana was at the time. Of that, there is little question.

[Box-Office]

Now you're copying and pasting posts from resident spastic FrankieBruno....lol.




Thanks for pointing out that I said Chaves would be a great opponent to get at short notice

Anyone spectacular means a big name. Chaves isn't spectacular, I haven't changed my view on that. Rios would be a better name but Chaves is a better fighter.

I said right after Brook beat Porter than Porter is a horrible boxer. I've never wavered from that. Brook dealt with him easily, Chaves will be tougher.

Feel free to refer to the picture you posted on the previous page.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Feel free to refer to the picture you posted on the previous page.

Nothing I've said is contradictory.

Whereas "Khan is ducking Brook and I'm disappointed" is very contrary to the way you have been behaving ever since that very embarrassing summer.

[FrankieBruno]

Chaves has been many wars, he's a human punchbag

[SalimShady1212]

At the time Ortiz had done nothing himself, he was just a hyped prospect.

Chaves is a more proven fighter than Maidana was at the time. Of that, there is little question.

I disagree, Maidana had worked his way up to the mandatory spot whereas Diego Chaves has fallen short in every big fight and has not beaten anyone worth of note. He also defended his title against a guy who was 12-11-3. Not to say he's not a tough opponent but I disagree that he is more proven.

[Box-Office]

I disagree, Maidana had worked his way up to the mandatory spot whereas Diego Chaves has fallen short in every big fight and has not beaten anyone worth of note. He also defended his title against a guy who was 12-11-3. Not to say he's not a tough opponent but I disagree that he is more proven.

Chaves is more proven, I have to agree with Dirk when he is right...........................a proven loser that is.

[Bigg Rigg]

A friend of mines just said there's talk on Twitter that Kell is secretly ****sexual and the stabbing incident was due to him trying to have or actually having sexual relations with men. Anybody else ever hear anything like this??? Or is this just rabid Khan diehards trying to shred the mans reputation??? Lmfao

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I disagree, Maidana had worked his way up to the mandatory spot whereas Diego Chaves has fallen short in every big fight and has not beaten anyone worth of note. He also defended his title against a guy who was 12-11-3. Not to say he's not a tough opponent but I disagree that he is more proven.

That's because he's fought elite fighters like Thurman and Bradley.

Maidana fell short against Kotelnik who is clearly not at that level.

[G_Child_123]

Nothing wrong with Chaves as an opponent.

It's all about seeing how Brook handles him in comparison to Thurman, Bradley and Rios.

[SalimShady1212]

That's because he's fought elite fighters like Thurman and Bradley.

Maidana fell short against Kotelnik who is clearly not at that level.

Agree to disagree on this. Maidana imo was far superior in status than Chaves is now. Chino had one loss and a 90% KO ratio and was the lost feared 140lber in the world.