Two bums going at it. I think berto takes boxing more serious(like it matter) and broner is an overhyped, lazy but talented fighter. I like bertos dedication over broners laziness.
Shoot this is a toss up. Anyway I hate picking Broner so I'll go with berto.
It's tough, Berto can't seem to win when he steps up, I want to say Berto. Broner has a couple of wins when he stepped up like DeMarco, Malignaggi. But I still think Berto wins because Broner is not a "step up". And Broner's "step ups" that he beat are B/C fighters. Berto lost to some guys that were pretty good at the time of his loss barring JSK.
Broner has trouble with fast handed combination punchers that come at him hard with lots of punches. Berto doesn't throw many punches or put much pressure on his opponents. If Broner has time to box at long range he has better skills than Berto and a much better chin. I think Broner could time Berto coming in and knock Berto out.
Comment